Cape Times

Reprieve for UK leader over Brexit

MPs support bill to cut EU ties

-

BRITAIN’S parliament yesterday backed a second reading of legislatio­n to sever ties with the EU, a reprieve for Prime Minister Theresa May who now faces demands by lawmakers for concession­s before it becomes law.

After more than 13 hours of speeches for and against the legislatio­n, which May says is essential for Brexit but critics describe as a Conservati­ve government powergrab, lawmakers voted 326 to 290 in favour of moving the EU withdrawal bill, or repeal bill, to the next stage of a lengthy lawmaking process.

Many fell in step with the government which said a vote against the legislatio­n would force Britain into a chaotic exit from the EU, rather than a smooth departure, as the country would lack laws and a regulatory framework to steer the process.

May, weakened by the loss of her majority in a June election, now faces a battle against politician­s who want to force amendments to the bill, first in the lower house of parliament and then in Britain’s unelected upper chamber.

“Earlier this morning (yesterday) parliament took a historic decision to back the will of the British people and vote for a bill which gives certainty and clarity ahead of our withdrawal from the EU,” May said.

“Although there is more to do, this decision means we can move on with negotiatio­ns with solid foundation­s and we continue to encourage MPs (lawmakers) from all parts of the UK to work together in support of this vital piece of legislatio­n.”

Her justice minister urged MPs to back the bill and signalled that the government would listen to their concerns despite describing some of their criticism as being “exaggerate­d up to and beyond the point of hyperbole”.

The bill seeks largely to “copy and paste” EU law into British legislatio­n to ensure Britain has functionin­g laws and the same regulatory framework as the bloc at the moment of Brexit, to offer some reassuranc­e for companies.

But the often impassione­d debate in the 650-seat parliament underlined the rifts exposed by last year’s EU referendum, not only in Britain’s main parties, but also in the entire country.

The opposition Labour Party had called on its lawmakers to vote against the bill if the government failed to make concession­s.

But seven rebelled, with some saying they had to respect the demands of their pro-Brexit voters.

“This is a deeply disappoint­ing result,” said Labour’s Brexit spokesman, Keir Starmer.

“This bill is an affront to parliament­ary democracy and a naked power-grab by government ministers… It will make the Brexit process more uncertain, and lead to division and chaos when we need unity and clarity.”

The government has defended the bill by saying it will allow Britain to become “masters of our own laws”, but it also gives ministers wide-ranging powers to amend laws to make them work domestical­ly, often by interchang­ing the word “EU” for Britain.

But lawmakers, both in Labour and May’s governing Conservati­ve Party, expressed fears the government would make substantia­l changes to legislatio­n without consulting parliament – a charge the government has denied.

Despite the victory for a government now dependent on the support of Northern Ireland’s Democratic Unionist Party to secure a working majority, ministers will face attempts by both Conservati­ve and Labour lawmakers to change the bill.

Some want assurances that the government will not misuse its power; others want to make sure the protection­s of certain workers’ rights are also written into the bill before allowing it to move to the upper house of parliament.

The process is expected to take months to complete and both houses should agree on the final wording before it can be passed.

 ?? PICTURE: AP ?? A supporter of Britain staying in the EU wears an EU flag mask during an antiBrexit protest outside the Houses of Parliament in London.
PICTURE: AP A supporter of Britain staying in the EU wears an EU flag mask during an antiBrexit protest outside the Houses of Parliament in London.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa