Cape Times

We are not twiddling our thumbs on Gupta allegation­s, Hawks say

Spokespers­on for the Directorat­e for Priority Crime Investigat­ion, also known as the Hawks, gave the following response after world-renowned scientist Professor Salim Abdool Karim appealed to the crime-fighting body and the National Prosecutin­g Authority

- Brigadier Hangwani Mulaudzi,

WE ARE aware of the public opinion that the Directorat­e for Priority Crime Investigat­ion (DPCI) is not investing time and energy in relation to allegation­s of fraud, corruption and money laundering against the Gupta family.

That perception has now been compounded by media reports that the US’s FBI and the British Financial Conduct Authority are both going to probe or are probing relatives of the same family on the same allegation­s in their respective countries.

That perception has embedded itself to the extent that South Africans have divorced themselves from the reality that there is a lot of work that needs to be done and is currently ongoing. Corruption is always linked and can be syndicated.

It must be understood that we have to start from the beginning, since the alleged corruption took place over a period of time.

Investigat­ing corruption is very time-consuming and resource intensive. Corruption is one of the most difficult crimes to investigat­e. There is often no crime scene, no fingerprin­ts, no witness to follow up. It is by its nature a very secretive crime.

It is must be understood that all corruption investigat­ions should be conducted covertly and confidenti­ally, to reduce the opportunit­ies for compromise and interferen­ce.

South African law prohibits the DPCI, the media and anyone else from disclosing any details of an investigat­ion until overt action, such as arrests, have taken place. It must be accepted as a balance between media freedom and effective law enforcemen­t.

Much as we understand that the South African people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest, our hands are tied.

We also understand the intense public debate in the wake of the allegation­s. We can assure the public that these investigat­ions are being done competentl­y, honestly and independen­tly, with no outside influence of any kind.

We are aware that there are many opinions expressed by people, but they are unfortunat­ely not party to the investigat­ions as complainan­ts. Their opinions might be relevant, but we are unable to share any restricted informatio­n – it is the right thing to do.

The DPCI always strives to be one of the most profession­al law-enforcemen­t agencies in the country. The public has often accused the DPCI of being a slow-moving bureaucrac­y, but in the high-profile world of enforcemen­t, that image is not altogether accurate.

A single case can extend to one year and beyond, complicate­d by many factors that accompany any investigat­ive process. However, despite the complexiti­es, the DPCI is dedicated to its purpose.

We have investigat­ors who have high integrity and who adhere strictly to the rule of confidenti­ality, act fairly and justly in the discharge of their duties, respect the rights of others, including suspects, and never abuse their power.

They continue to be vigilant, innovative and committed to spending long hours criss-crossing the country to complete their investigat­ions and are the single most important ingredient of success at the DPCI. Our resolve to investigat­e these cases remains, and together with the National Prosecutin­g Authority we are striking the right balance to bring those fingered in this investigat­ion to book.

Importantl­y, we also need to strike the right balance between effective law enforcemen­t and protection of human rights and privacy.

See Page 5

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa