Actress lashes EFF over H&M protest method
Call for probe into ‘ignorance around issues of race’ in advertising
THE EFF yesterday remained unapologetic about its actions at clothing retailer H&M, describing those critical of its methods as “adopting the language of the oppressor”.
The party’s supporters yesterday protested in front of the Mall of Africa H&M store in Midrand, Gauteng.
South African actress Pearl Thusi took to Twitter to slam the actions of the party and AfriForum deputy head Ernst Roets announced that they would lay criminal charges of incitement to public violence against Julius Malema‚ Floyd Shivambu and Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi of the EFF
At the weekend, EFF members stormed six of the Swedish retailer’s stores in Pretoria, Joburg and Cape Town, breaking mirrors and pushing over shop mannequins.
The party was protesting against an allegedly racist advert which showed photos of an African child wearing a hoodie with the phrase “Coolest Monkey in the Jungle”, contrary to the one worn by a white child with the words “Survival Expert”.
Thusi engaged with Ndlozi on Twitter where she referred to the measures taken by the EFF as misrepresenting South Africans.
“Instead of fighting at their level you’re just going to vandalise stores and establishments? Spread violence and fear? Oh, okay. Just misrepresent us all as savages then,” Thusi tweeted.
Yesterday, EFF spokesperson Ndlozi responded: “Pearl is an ANC mascot who believes blacks with stones fighting oppression are savages. Of course, it would be a waste of breath to try to educate her about adopting the language of the oppressor to describe herself.”
The Ahmed Kathrada Foundation is considering whether to meet with the company after writing a letter sent to H&M’s global headquarters and to its local offices.
“It is of serious concern that your company published the advert without considering the historical context of how the word and image of a ‘monkey’ has been used to racially demean black people for generations,” it stated.
The foundation also said this was not the first time that H&M had come under scrutiny. In 2015, the company came under criticism from a social media user for not featuring black models following the opening of its stores in South Africa. The company’s response via Twitter implied that white models were featured to create a “positive image”.
“These two incidents are perhaps indicative of the type of ignorance that continues to prevail around issues related to race, perhaps not only at H&M, but in the broader advertising sector and in society in general,” said the foundation’s executive director, Neeshan Balton.
H&M has reportedly closed some of its stores in the country, but employees of the company in Cape Town said their stores are operating normally.
Meanwhile, the DA said it will write to the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC): “It is clear that H&M has violated the ICC’s code of advertising with its racially discriminatory advert. We therefore request that the ICC, as the foremost retail authority, fully investigate this incident and institute appropriate sanctions once an investigation has been completed,” said the party’s national spokesperson, Refiloe Ntsekhe.
The SA Chamber of Commerce and Industry has also condemned the advert but criticised the manner in which the EFF responded.