Cape Times

Twin Peaks: All you need to know about the change from FSB to the FSCA

- Shayne Krige Shayne Krige is the director and head of investment funds at Werksmans Attorneys.

THE SOUTH African financial services sector has had a new “sheriff” since April 1, when the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) replaced the Financial Services Board (FSB). Here is what you need to know about this developmen­t.

The change from the FSB to the FSCA is a further step on the path towards implementi­ng the “Twin Peaks” model of financial sector regulation in South Africa.

To date, South Africa has had an “integrated” approach to financial regulation, with the FSB acting as a “super-regulator” responsibl­e for regulating the conduct of financial market participan­ts and the prudential soundness of financial institutio­ns.

The main advantage of the super-regulator approach is that it enables the focused use of resources, notably personnel, in countries where these resources are scarce.

However, critics argue that market conduct and prudential regulation require fundamenta­lly different approaches and cultures, and note that no country that has adopted Twin Peaks has reverted to a super-regulator model.

South Africa has implemente­d Twin Peaks through the Financial Sector Regulation Act, which has come into force, but is only partially in effect.

Two regulators

The twin peaks of regulation in South Africa will be:

Market conduct regulation, including investment funds and investment managers, which will be the domain of the FSCA; and

The regulation of financial institutio­ns, including banks, which will be the domain of the Prudential Authority (PA), housed in the South African Reserve Bank.

The shift from the current sectoral licensing model to a more centralise­d, activity-based licensing model has not yet been adopted. This will follow the implementa­tion of a new licensing regime, which will focus on the activities that a prospectiv­e licensee wants to perform, rather than on particular sectors of the market.

The Conduct of Financial Institutio­ns (Cofi) Act will define these activities in a single, overarchin­g law and will replace the Financial Advisory and Intermedia­ry Services Act.

Financial institutio­ns, including entities currently regulated as financial services providers, will need to hold a licence from the FSCA to render a financial service in respect of the specific, defined activities they perform. The National Treasury has set up a panel to develop the Cofi Bill, and it is expected that the first draft will be distribute­d for comment around the middle of this year.

The parameters of licensing under the Cofi Bill have not been finalised, but current discussion­s have contemplat­ed that:

A “one-size-fits-all” approach will not be taken to licensing. The requiremen­ts for licensees will be proportion­ate to the risks underlying the business activities of different entities.

The FSCA will enter into memoranda of understand­ing with other regulatory authoritie­s, including the PA, so that there is clarity as to the requiremen­ts applying to licensees that fall under the supervisio­n of multiple regulatory authoritie­s.

It will take some time for the draft Cofi Bill to be finalised. Until then, the licences issued by the FSB will remain in force and the licensing of new entities will continue to take place under the existing financial sector laws, although those “old” laws will be implemente­d by the FSCA.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa