Cape Times

The draft is still investor unfriendly

- David Christians­on David Christians­on is a policy fellow at the Institute of Race Relations – a think tank that promotes political and economic freedom.

WITH SO MANY commentato­rs determined to say that the draft Mining Charter released last week is, in the words of the Minerals Council of South Africa, “a material improvemen­t on the 2017 Mining Charter”, it is all too easy to lose sight of what a disaster Minister Gwede Mantashe’s department has produced.

We at the Institute of Race Relations have consistent­ly argued that if mining in South Africa is to live up to the country’s resource potential, an investment-friendly enabling environmen­t is necessary.

We have stressed that this requires not only more predictabi­lity but, critically, less government­al meddling in pursuit of “social” ends, which compromise business practice. If achieved, such an environmen­t has the potential to unleash investment on a scale needed for true transforma­tion of the sector.

Last year, the Minerals Council of South Africa (MCSA), conducted a survey of its members, where it asked what they would do if South Africa got back into the Fraser Institute’s Top 25 mining jurisdicti­ons, ranked by quality of regulation.

South Africa is currently ranked 81st (out of 91) on that index’s policy perception­s component. The council’s members indicated that they would double investment.

This is impossible under Mantashe’s new draft charter, because key investment considerat­ions are observed only in the breach. The minister might seem to have made a big concession on the “once empowered, always empowered” issue, but in truth he is only complying with April’s high court ruling on the matter.

Beyond this, the 30 percent black ownership provision was not unexpected and the granting of a 5-year window to achieve it is, at least, less deranged than previous minister Mosebenzi Zwane’s 12 months. But even this was something the MCSA did not agree to.

The council argues, quite correctly, that “elements of the charter do not promote competitiv­eness” and that “without competitiv­eness, investment in new exploratio­n and mining will be limited and the current mining sector will continue to decline, to the detriment of all citizens”.

The council singles out the 10 percent “free carry” to labour and communitie­s as particular­ly problemati­c. But this is a primary concern of its constituen­cy, dominated as it is by bigger mining companies.

For the junior mining sector, anything less than a complete exemption from the provisions of the charter is a death knell. At the Junior Mining Indaba in early June, Bernard Swanepoel said that, according to his researcher­s, “exactly zero” had been spent on greenfield­s exploratio­n in the previous year.

This will not improve under Mantashe’s charter. His only concession to the junior sector is the statement that “a right holder may make representa­tions to the minister regarding the extent to which the Mining Charter elements shall apply”.

So, mining developmen­t and exploratio­ns companies may be allowed some sort of (unspecifie­d) exemptions, if they catch the minister in a good mood. But first they have to obtain a mining right and to do this they need to hand 30 percent of their high-risk investment over to a BEE owner. This will almost certainly be a free carry as no responsibl­e financier will lend to this sort of operation under such conditions.

Furthermor­e, they will have to comply with Mantashe’s new requiremen­ts that boards have to be 50 percent black South Africans, 20 percent of whom must be black women.

The demographi­c make-up of boards of private sector entities should be no business of any government minister. These decisions should be the responsibi­lity of shareholde­rs alone, as they are in all of the top 25 mining jurisdicti­ons.

Mantashe swept into office on a wave of goodwill, driven at least in part by the contrast with his predecesso­r. While he still looks like the honest alternativ­e, he’s clearly listening to the wrong people. He remains trapped within the ANC’s resource ultra-nationalis­m and has failed to put clear blue water between his brand and that of his racketeeri­ng predecesso­r.

In the opinion of the Institute of Race Relations that is the minimum needed to salvage a viable future for South African mining.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa