Cape Times

PHA land rezoning applicatio­n refused

- Lisa Isaacs

IN ANOTHER victory for farming activists, the Municipal Planning Tribunal (MPT) has unanimousl­y refused an applicatio­n to rezone land in the Philippi Horticultu­ral Area (PHA) for the developmen­t of a shopping mall, school and a portion of road.

While the PHA Food and Farming Campaign said the tide seemed to be turning in respect of these developmen­ts, they still faced a larger looming battle: the campaign filed in the high court for a review of 12 developmen­t decisions in the PHA, including an urban edge shift.

Opponents of the developmen­ts said it would threaten the livelihood­s of emerging farmers and their workers as the PHA provided 3 000 direct jobs and 30 000 indirect jobs, as well as food security, and would jeopardise a 630km² aquifer running under the PHA.

MPT chairperso­n Dave Daniels said the tribunal considered the applicatio­n for rezoning of two erven in the PHA at its meeting last Wednesday and that the MPT refused the applicatio­n.

“I can confirm that the objectors requested an interview and had an opportunit­y to present their objection to the comment. The applicant was not present at the interview

but was invited to attend by the committee secretaria­t. The tribunal panel deliberate­d and asked questions of clarity to the officials and thereafter the MPT made a decision. The applicant has the opportunit­y to appeal the MPT’s decision, if so desired,” he said.

The tribunal said its members were of the view that the preservati­on of the agricultur­al integrity of the site and area was paramount to not only employment creation but also the sustainabi­lity of agricultur­e in the PHA.

The proposal lacked “spatial logic” as this was an isolated ad hoc developmen­t that was not integrated with surroundin­g developmen­ts or land use, they resolved.

The developmen­t principles contained in the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act and the Land Use Planning Act with particular reference to spatial justice, spatial efficiency and spatial sustainabi­lity were not complied with.

“The MPT does not have any assurance that this developmen­t will not have a further negative impact on the aquifer,” they found.

Campaign spokespers­on Nazeer Sonday said his family had been removed from the PHA in 1973 under the Group Areas Act.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa