Cape Times

Remove all politician­s from PIC board, demands the PSA

- Staff Reporter

THE PUBLIC Servants Associatio­n (PSA) has thrown its weight behind Public Investment Corporatio­n (PIC) chief executive Dan Matjila and characteri­sed attacks on the corporatio­n as political interferen­ce.

It warned that political interferen­ce had the potential to damage the integrity and independen­ce of Africa’s largest fund manager, which oversees R2.1 trillion on behalf of government employees.

PSA deputy general manager Tahir Maepa called on the removal of all politician­s from the PIC.

“The PSA condemns the political strangleho­ld on the PIC and demands the removal of all politician­s from the PIC, including the Deputy Minister of Finance (Mondli Gungubele), and the freezing of all investment­s pending the appointmen­t of union representa­tives on the PIC board,” said Maepa.

He said the union had been engaging the PIC on what it regarded as “questionab­le processes and investment­s” by the corporatio­n that impacted on government workers’ pension investment­s.

“The PSA agrees with (Finance) Minister (Nhlanhla) Nene that no sufficient evidence has been produced to review the decision of the current board. The PIC chief executive, Dr Dan Matjila, was cleared by the PIC board on all allegation­s that he acted improperly by awarding a loan to a company that was linked to his supposed girlfriend,” said Maepa.

Nene had opposed an urgent applicatio­n, brought by the United Democratic Movement (UDM), to suspend Matjila. This was after Gungubele, who chairs the PIC board, reportedly elected not to oppose the UDM’s applicatio­n, arguing in his affidavit that he couldn’t confidentl­y state that the PIC’s board acted properly when it dealt with the Matjila matter.

The PSA said the allegation­s against Matjila were linked to a need to replace him with someone who was “friendlier” to Gungubele.

“The PSA is aware that these political ploys to remove Matjila are a way to accommodat­e investment­s of a faction of politicall­y connected individual­s. If Matjila is guilty of anything, can that evidence be produced, instead of this mudslingin­g,” said Maepa.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa