Cape Times

Unions rally behind PIC CEO

- Siviwe Feketha

COSATU is consulting with its affiliates regarding attempts to remove Public Investment Corporatio­n (PIC) CEO Dan Matjila, as the fight for control of the funding institutio­n intensifie­s among political elites.

Yesterday, Cosatu spokespers­on Sizwe Pamla said the federation wanted to consolidat­e a response to the developmen­ts at the PIC, which manages public funds and assets in excess of R1.9 trillion.

“We want them to respond to what is going on as a bloc, meaning they have to meet and get more informatio­n from the Government Employees Pension Fund and the PIC to respond on these issues,” Pamla said.

On Thursday, the Public Servants Associatio­n (PSA), the largest public service union with more than 230 000 members, threw its weight behind Finance Minister Nhlanhla Nene in what the union called political interferen­ce in the affairs of the PIC.

This comes as Nene moved to block plans by the United Democratic Movement to force him to suspend Matjila over allegation­s of funding some businessme­n without approval of the board, among others.

The UDM filed an urgent applicatio­n in the North Gauteng High Court last month in a bid to block the PIC board from taking any actions against Matjila, as it accused it of a conflict of interest.

UDM leader Bantu Holomisa instead demanded that Nene immediatel­y fire Matjila, who he accused of personally releasing funding worth R2bn to several businessme­n with close ties to the PIC without approval from the board.

In his answering affidavit filed on July 2, Nene said the PIC matter did not need the attention of the courts because moves were currently under way to address the allegation­s.

Nene said he had requested a detailed report, including internal audit reports, on the allegation­s from the PIC board, including views from members who were not conflicted on whether disciplina­ry steps needed to be taken against Matjila and other implicated executives within the PIC.

Nene said that while he was aware of the importance of the state-owned asset manager, inviting the courts to usurp his powers would breach the principle of separation of powers.

He accused the UDM of being driven by a narrow political agenda by lodging the applicatio­n, as he had briefed the party regarding the developmen­ts aimed at addressing the allegation­s.

“The applicatio­n appears to be intended to serve a narrow political agenda, as opposed to the public’s interest,” he said.

Nene branded the UDM’s applicatio­n as being full of misconcept­ions, adding that the party’s allegation­s that the board was disqualifi­ed from acting against Matjila were not sufficient to establish a disabling conflict of interest.

He called for the UDM’s applicatio­n to be dismissed with costs, saying the allegation­s we still yet to be tested.

“There can be no valid legal conclusion­s based on untested hearsay allegation­s. In the fullness of time, an investigat­ive process will unfold, and these issues will be dealt with appropriat­ely and holistical­ly.

“The question of what the appropriat­e steps should be, in the present case, is an issue that lies at the heartland of executive power,” he said.

The high court stopped Holomisa from repeating his claims of corruption within the PIC last Monday, after several company and business leaders he had implicated successful­ly interdicte­d him.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa