Index misses mark

THE Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs has launched its Ease of Living Index, ranking 111 Indian cities inhabited by more than 130 million people. The exercise itself is a welcome admission of the fact that India’s urbanisation process might have unleashed its own set of problems. In addition to the normal demographic drivers – rural to urban migration as people seek non-farm jobs, and large-scale movement from smaller to bigger cities in search of better opportunities – two factors have triggered India’s urbanisation

The first has primarily increased the number of people who live in abysmal conditions and earn their living in informal, low-income jobs. The latter is best described by the IT boom which has virtually created new cities or completely changed older ones. With a burgeoning urban population, existing urban infrastructure, both institutional and physical, is being tested. From demands of reservations for locals in educational institutes and hospitals, to permanent damage to eco-systems, drainage networks and water tables, side-effects of poorly thought out and badly regulated urbanisation are beginning to show.

It on these macro questions that the new index disappoints. How far can releasing annual city-wise rankings on ease of living take us in dealing with such long-term challenges? And last but not least, the index also shows that the state continues to (wrongly) believe it knows more about our economy and society than we do. How else does one explain the fact that Delhi is ranked at the 109th place among 111 cities on the economic sub-index?