Trump’s vile ploy on South Africa
TRUST President Donald Trump, following his familiar tactic of deflecting attention from yet another scandal by issuing some outrageous tweet, to come down hard on the wrong side of an issue he knows nothing about, based on no more than a slanted Fox News programme.
In a late-Wednesday tweet, Trump said he had asked Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to look into land seizures and the “large-scale killing of farmers” in South Africa.
It was the first time he had mentioned Africa by name in a tweet as president.
His source was a grossly one-sided report by the Fox host Tucker Carlson asserting that the South African president, Cyril Ramaphosa, was seizing land from his citizens because they are the wrong “skin colour”.
There have been no large-scale killings of white farmers, and Ramaphosa’s proposal to change the constitution to allow expropriation of land without compensation has not yet passed. That said, the issue does deserve a close look.
There can be no question that South Africa’s black people were long denied fair access to land. The Natives Land Act of 1913 essentially reserved most of the land to the white minority, and the restrictions became more onerous in the apartheid era.
When that system was finally dismantled almost 25 years ago, a new constitution did provide for land reform, but the process has moved slowly. Statistics vary, but what is clear is that whites, who are less than 10% of the population, continue to own more than two-thirds of the land, while black South Africans, the overwhelming majority, own a much smaller share.
That “highly skewed” distribution of land and productive assets, according to the World Bank, contributes heavily to making South Africa “the world’s most unequal country”.
This does not mean that expropriation without compensation is a wise remedy, especially in light of the disastrous consequences such action had in undermining the economy in neighbouring Zimbabwe.
Nor does it absolve the ANC for the corruption that has infected the governing party after more than two decades of virtually unchallenged rule, most egregiously under Jacob Zuma, who was ousted as president in February and is on trial on charges of fraud and racketeering.
Ramaphosa argued in an op-ed article in the Financial Times that his proposal was “no land grab” and that the ANC’s land reform programme would not undermine investment in the economy or damage agricultural production.
The constitutional amendment he is seeking, he said, would strengthen the existing rules by making explicit the conditions under which land could be expropriated without compensation.
All that is subject to debate and study, which is now under way.
Yet Trump’s tweet, and the Fox show on which it was based, were bereft of any context, sympathy or understanding.
They pounced, instead, on the false narratives of right-wing white South African groups claiming widespread seizures of white-owned land and a continuing “white genocide”.
In fact, the number of killings of farmers and farmworkers is at a 20-year low, with 47 in the 2017-18 fiscal year, according to AgriSA, a farmers’ organisation in South Africa. The numbers have been declining steadily since peaking in 1998, when 153 were killed.
Not surprisingly, South Africa reacted angrily to Trump’s tweet, saying it reflected a “narrow perception which only seeks to divide our nation and reminds us of our colonial past”.
Sadly, it probably reflects even less than that – a clueless grasp at a racially tinged political diversion. As Patrick Gaspard, a former US ambassador to South Africa and now president of the Open Society Foundations, tweeted, “This man has never visited the continent and has no discernible Africa policy”.