Cape Times

Let communitie­s, not government, decide on their own future

- MICHAEL DONEN Michael Donen SC is an advocate at the Cape Bar and a listed counsel of the Internatio­nal Criminal Court

TO WHOM does the mineral wealth of South Africa belong? Who should benefit from it? What rights should communitie­s have when foreign mining companies want to uproot them?

Trans-world Energy and Mineral Resources (TEM), an Australian­owned company, attempted to obtain mining rights to the titanium rich dunes in Xolobeni, the Umgungundl­ovu community’s pristine Wild Coast home. As required by law, TEM sought to hold consultati­ons with the community. The community said “no”, as is their right. TEM tried again. The community said “no” again.

The events read like The Godfather. The award-winning documentar­y The Shore Break depicts them. “Watch out what you say,” those protesting were told by a mining protagonis­t. “There will be consequenc­es to objecting.” Then Sikhosiphi “Bazooka” Radebe, chairperso­n of the community group opposing mining, was killed in a hail of bullets. Then-mineral resources minister Mosebenzi Zwane consequent­ly issued an 18-month moratorium on mining. Despite attempts to divide the community through selective “gifts” to traditiona­l leaders, despite insults, violence and murder, the community stood firm throughout.

Last month the North Gauteng High Court confirmed that the community’s full and informed consent was needed before mining rights could be granted. The decision was based on the fact that the community holds informal rights to land while they occupy it in accordance with their law and custom. The rights are protected by the Interim Protection of Informal Land Rights Act, which prohibits deprivatio­n without consent.

The government apparently intends to appeal the judgment.

If communitie­s rather than the government were left to decide, there would never be mining, the current minister, Gwede Mantashe, argues. Why would the government think this? Only two reasons seem plausible. The first would be that they think that local communitie­s are idiots, unable to recognise what is in their own self-interest.

The second would be because they recognise communitie­s are not idiots, and have a very clear idea of their self-interest, and the offers made by mining companies are not worthwhile to them – but the government wants mining to happen anyway.

There is plenty of evidence for the second. Other communitie­s in South Africa have faced disastrous social, economic and ecological consequenc­es when miners have moved in. The Umgungundl­ovu community – for good reason – fear physical displaceme­nt from their homes, economic displaceme­nt of their community, and complete destructio­n of their cultural way of life and environmen­t.

And far from hiding away from the modern economy, the community have intelligen­tly suggested eco-tourism and agricultur­e rather than mining as a way to monetise the currently unspoilt and pristine land. These are informed choices made about their own futures.

It should also be emphasised that the communal land and residentia­l plots of each household form an inextricab­le and integral part of the community’s way of life. Plots represent more than a place to live. They are symbols of social maturity and social dignity.

The Umgungundl­ovu community are not idiots. Their decisions should be respected – by the government, by the law, by TEM, and by what actually happens.

If foreign mining companies want communitie­s to consent to mining, then it is their job to come up with an offer to which the community will agree. Mining companies may wish to present these people as irrational blockages to progress. To the rest of us, they’re just sensible people saying no to a rubbish deal.

Bluntly, mining companies would really have to make some incredible offers – financiall­y and in terms of social responsibi­lity. They would have to find ways to convince communitie­s that, this time, they would live up to their promises.

Well, good! I suspect most people (though clearly not the government) would say the same.

If communitie­s are allowed to choose what happens on their land, then the mineral wealth of the country will, for the first time in South Africa’s history, actually be used to enrich the people of South Africa. What a strange and wonderful change that would be.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa