Cape Times

Target those who submit fraudulent claims

- ANTHONY PEDERSON | chief executive, Medscheme

THE BOARD of Healthcare Funders (BHF) has said at least 10% to 15% of all medical aid claims are fraudulent, abusive or wasteful in nature, a substantia­l expense in a R150-billion industry. The total fraud costs in the South African private health-care system is estimated at approximat­ely R22bn each year.

It is a pity that instead of dealing with this monster in our midst, this national pandemic of looting, much of it deeply systemic, some medical practition­ers have resorted to diverting attention away from fraud, waste and abuse.

Judging by the headlines “‘Bully’ medical aids irk doctors” (Business Report, Pretoria News, January 28), “Doctors accuse Medscheme of bullying tactics” (Business Report, The Star, January 28), and “Medscheme cited for unfair practices,”(Business Report, Daily News, January 28), it may seem that it is actually the medical aid companies who are at fault. The story by Sne Masuku, carried by Business Report in the three newspapers, was heavy on conjecture and an unfair misreprese­ntation of the facts. Over the past three years, Medscheme has recovered more than R741.9 million from fraud, waste and abuse cases. There has never been any evidence that doctors are being victimised. However the recovery of R741.9m and the R22bn total costs of fraud a year is proof that it is in fact medical schemes which have suffered financiall­y as a result of fraudulent claims.

Had Sne cared to contact Medscheme, or editors insisted on balanced reporting, we would have alerted them to the following facts:

The National Health Care Profession­als Associatio­n brought an applicatio­n in the High Court against Medscheme and other health-care providers requesting that our forensic processes be declared unlawful and unconstitu­tional;

The case was dismissed. They were further denied leave to appeal. The court said they had no reasonable prospects of success;

The losing applicants, including Donald Gumede, one of the sources of the story, now face personal costs for reckless litigation. Judge for yourself why he is spreading lies;

Jimmy Mufamadi is not a medical doctor, he is an occupation­al therapist who misreprese­nts himself as a doctor and he was paid more than R20m over two years by the medical schemes in the industry for submitting false claims for appliances and services that were never rendered. As soon as a police investigat­ion has been finalised, Medscheme will formalise a case of fraud against him. It is anyone’s guess why he is spreading lies.

Due to the urgent and immediate health-care needs of our clients, payments are paid on the basis of trust and goodwill. So unlike other insurance sectors, where an assessor will first assess a claim to determine validity, we have to pay first and only check validity of a claim afterwards. This naturally exposes the medical aid industry to a greater degree of abuse.

Medscheme will continue to collaborat­e with health-care profession­als, regulators, industry bodies and all stakeholde­rs to reduce fraud, provide sustainabl­e health care and reduce the costs of services.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa