Cape Times

PIC was run by a deeply divided board

Mondli Gungubele was quizzed on its status after the mass resignatio­n which followed damning allegation­s

- AYANDA MDLULI Ayanda.Mdluli@inl.co.za

THE PIC COMMISSION of Inquiry continued yesterday, with Deputy Finance Minister Mondli Gungubele’s turn to be quizzed.

The Board of the Public Investment Corporatio­n (PIC), of which Gungubele is also the chairperso­n, is currently in limbo.

If any decisions are made, the current members who have all asked to be relieved of their duties will not be held accountabl­e in the near future for any decisions made at an institutio­n that is responsibl­e for close to R2 trillion worth of government pension funds.

The lack of accountabi­lity and the negative effects that this may have on the national fiscus formed part of Deputy Finance Minister Mondli Gungubele’s testimony during the PIC Commission of Inquiry, which is chaired by former Supreme Court Justice Lex Mpati.

Gill Marcus, the former Reserve Bank Governor, who is also assisting the commission, grilled Gungubele on the status of the board, after the mass resignatio­n which followed damning allegation­s by whistle-blower James Noko (not his/her real name), and which implicated the deputy finance minister, board member Sibusisiwe Zulu, her live-in lover Lawrence Mulaudzi, current acting chief executive Matshepo More and board member Dudu Hlatshwayo.

Gungubele gave his testimony under oath at the Mpati Commission in Pretoria yesterday. The PIC Commission is investigat­ing issues of impropriet­y and corruption that occurred over the last few years. Some directors have been accused of unduly benefiting in a series of dodgy deals involving Ascendis, technology group EOH, the infamous Steinhoff, as well as Karan Beef.

A deal involving Ayo Technology Solutions is also under scrutiny. When asked for comment, Gungubele said the PIC Commission would also look at other deals that occurred during the period in question.

The evidence leader of the PIC Commission, advocate Jannie Lubbe, said deals that were highlighte­d in UDM leader Bantu Holomisa’s letter to President Cyril Ramaphosa, which led to the establishm­ent of the commission, would also be heard and interrogat­ed in the commission.

Others who testified include the PIC’s head of internal audit, Lufuno Nemagovhan­i, head of corporate affairs, Deon Botha and acting company secretary Wilhelmina Louw.

Botha gave evidence stating that most media reports involving Ayo were based on factual inaccuraci­es.

“In retrospect, following the testimony at this commission by head of internal audit Mr Lufuno Nemagovhan­i, as well as assistant portfolio manager in listed equities Mr Victor

Seanie, it seems as if media statements attributed to me might have contained incorrect informatio­n.” He referred to articles in City Press, AmaBhungan­e, Bloomberg and Business Day

Marcus instructed Gungubele to give an update on the status of the board, asking if the board was still in quorum.

Gungubele responded, claiming

that the board was not in quorum; however, Minister of Finance Tito Mboweni had not yet responded to the letter of resignatio­n.

Marcus questioned the legality of decisions taken between now and when Mboweni eventually responds to the resignatio­n letter.

On cross-examinatio­n, Gungubele revealed that there was a high possibilit­y

of the board being in limbo after Gungubele openly admitted that it was facing some serious challenges at the PIC. This seemed to contradict his earlier statement in his affidavit, which stated that the board had “fulfilled its fiduciary duties” and there was “no profession­al crisis”.

Marcus continued, asking Gungubele if the board was “dysfunctio­nal”, following the resignatio­ns of nine board members.

The PIC, in a recent statement, said the emails from Noko implicatin­g the board members and Gungubele would be the subject of an investigat­ion at the Mpati Commission. Marcus said it was important to determine if the board was not dysfunctio­nal.

“The status of any decisions made by the board or any of sub-committees must also be looked at. I would like to urge you to get a legal opinion. It looks as though the board has not got any clarity on its status from the time of its resignatio­n… Given that the board resigned by staying in its current position, should the board be able to take any decisions which they won’t be held accountabl­e for in the future because they are in limbo.”

Gungubele said Mboweni had not responded to the resignatio­n letter as he was preoccupie­d with the Budget. When Mpati pressed Gungubele if he was forced to resign, Gungubele said the members sat as a group and had a discussion.

“We looked at the emails from the whistle-blower and we resolved that we are in a situation where the decisions that we take, the quality of them, will be questioned. It was not an admission of guilt, but due to the public perception and size of the asset we thought it would be prudent to step aside. We had to deal with (the) situation and we thought maybe it’s better to walk away instead of being told to walk away,” he explained.

Gungubele also gave evidence on how Dan Matjila, the former chief executive of the PIC, presided over a deeply divided board at the embattled institutio­n, where close to R100 billion of government employee pension funds have been wiped out as a result of bad investment­s in companies such as Steinhoff, where R24bn was written down.

“There appears to be this view that the board is divided. Perhaps one must clarify that the board found itself divided on issues relating to former chief executive Dr Matjila. Divisions also play themselves out when reviewing some of the decisions he took. This even created an impression that there are pro- and anti-Dr Dan camps on the board.”

So far, the identity of the whistle-blower remains elusive and steps are being taken to find his/her true identity. According to Gungubele, Noko could be someone who is part of the board or a senior current, or former, employee at the PIC, as he/ she seems to have an understand­ing of the institutio­n.

“I believe he (she) is in the institutio­n. It is someone who understand­s the institutio­n. In instances about the PIC, whoever Noko is, he (she) understand­s closely what is happening. I doubt that it could be someone who is confidentl­y speculatin­g from the outside,” said Gungubele.

 ??  ??
 ?? TIMOTHY BERNARD African News Agency (ANA) ?? MONDLI Gungubele says he doubts that the whistle-blower is a PIC outsider. |
TIMOTHY BERNARD African News Agency (ANA) MONDLI Gungubele says he doubts that the whistle-blower is a PIC outsider. |

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa