Cape Times

Mbalula ‘wept’ when promoted by Zuma

Former ministers corroborat­e evidence of how he revealed Guptas had prior knowledge of Cabinet changes

- SIVIWE FEKETHA siviwe.feketha@inl.co.za

FORMER ministers Trevor Manuel and Siphiwe Nyanda have corroborat­ed evidence of how ANC national executive committee member Fikile Mbalula first revealed that the Gupta family had prior knowledge of Cabinet changes under former president Jacob Zuma.

Manuel and Nyanda, who were ministers responsibl­e for the Presidency and communicat­ions respective­ly, were yesterday testifying before the Zondo Commission of Inquiry into State Capture on allegation­s that the Guptas had prior knowledge of changes to the Cabinet before ministers were hired or fired.

Manuel detailed how Mbalula cried during an ANC NEC meeting in 2011, complainin­g that the Guptas had in 2010 summoned him to the family’s Saxonwold compound and congratula­ted him for being promoted by Zuma from being deputy police minister to being sports minister.

This was before Zuma made his massive October 2010 Cabinet reshuffle or told Mbalula about his intention to appoint him to his Cabinet.

“When it came to the opportunit­y for Mbalula in that meeting, he became very emotional… he said he was at first very excited about making it into the Cabinet but in retrospect it should never have been the Guptas or anybody else who told him that,” Manuel said.

Despite the explosive allegation by Mbalula, Zuma avoided the topic during the meeting, he said.

“At that time it seemed there was a climate where certain individual­s were invited to Saxonwold, not only Mbalula, but he was the first to make that declaratio­n.

“This was the first confirmati­on, which was in the form of an emotional statement about how he had been appointed,” he said.

Nyanda, who was fired with other six ministers by Zuma in the same Cabinet, said the revelation­s by Mbalula confirmed the influence of the Guptas over Zuma and the government, which was then being speculated about.

“In the midst of the undercurre­nts that were afoot at that time about the influence of the family in the affairs of government, it was for me the confirmati­on that this was the case,” Nyanda said.

He said Zuma’s failure to respond to Mbalula was also proof that he did consult with the Guptas about intended Cabinet changes.

“Here is something serious that is being alleged by a member of the national executive and it is directed specifical­ly at the president. One would have expected him to respond, but he did not, even in his closing remarks,” Nyanda said.

Manuel – a former finance minister from 1996 until 2009 – has accused Zuma of repurposin­g the role of the state and entrenchin­g patronage after he took over as the head of state.

He said Zuma did this by bloating his Cabinet and by firing recalcitra­nt ministers, and replaced them with people who were more pliant.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa