Car (South Africa)

CVT QUESTIONS

-

After reading the CVT article in the March 2021 issue, I have some questions on three im‐ portant aspects:

1. How does the transmissi­on efficiency (transmissi­on IN to transmissi­on OUT) compare with other types of transmis‐ sions? I understand CVTS are good for optimum engine speed, but transmissi­on effi‐ ciency (low losses) is also im‐ portant. For me, it is difficult to compare due to many factors but I get the impression that accelerati­on times and fuel consumptio­n of CVTS are not as good as other cars?

2. How reliable (and low maintenanc­e) are CVTS? Manu‐ als are very reliable as are nor‐ mal autos. Our Golf4 AT did nearly 300 000 km in 15+ years without changing the transmis‐ sion oil and I floored the car many times to pass vehicles. DCTS are questionab­le.

3. How reliable are CVTS in stop/start traffic, including steep incline situations? Nor‐ mal autos capably handle this but DCTS not as well. HERMAN MEYER

Mossel Bay

Transmissi­on efficiency of CVTS is lower than convention­al automatic, dual-clutch and manual transmis‐ sions. Continuous developmen­t to improve the efficiency of CVTS and ATS makes it difficult to provide pre‐ cise figures but it’s estimated the best ATS are about 3% behind M/TS and the best CVTS a further 3% be‐ hind. CVTS almost match ATS at lower engine speeds but the losses increase with increased engine speed and torque input.

The real efficiency benefit of a CVT is its ability to keep an engine operating within its most efficient range, resulting in typical fuel con‐ sumption improvemen­ts in the range of 2% to 5% over both MT and AT.

These figures apply to straightfo­r‐ ward, normally aspirated engines; variable valve timing/lift, turbochar‐ ging and direct injection all expand the range of engine efficiency and the CVT fuel consumptio­n benefit would be reduced.

Maintenanc­e is not an issue with transmissi­on oil changes typically specified every 30 000 to 40 000 km.

I could find only one recommenda‐ tion for a belt change interval and that was at 160 000 km, less fre‐ quent than a cambelt.

Many CVTS are now fitted with torque convertors which should provide similar durability to conven‐ tional ATS. Others are fitted with electronic­ally controlled wet or dry clutches, similar to DCTS, with dur‐ ability in stop/start traffic, but this is dependent on driving style?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa