Daily Dispatch

Wheels coming off airline’s baggage liability

-

IF YOUR check-in luggage is damaged in transit, the airline you flew with is responsibl­e for repairing or replacing it, right?

You’d be right in assuming so, given that it’s the fair and just thing to do.

Plus the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) states that “when a supplier has possession of any … property belonging to a consumer, the supplier must … in the handling, safeguardi­ng and utilisatio­n of that property, exercise the degree of care, diligence and skill that can reasonably be expected of a person responsibl­e for managing any property belonging to another person; and is liable to the owner of the property for any loss resulting from a failure to [do so].”

But when it comes to airlines, and low-cost airlines in South Africa in particular, it seems, that’s generally not the case. Not unless you pay extra for the airline’s baggage insurance.

I recently received a tip-off from the owner of a luggage business – who asked not to be named – about “a new trend” of airlines refusing to pay for the repair of luggage damaged while in their possession unless the passenger had bought the airline’s extra travel insurance option.

“I get a lot of queries from my customers in this regard wanting to know where they stand. As a company responsibl­e for your goods in transit, surely they are automatica­lly liable for any damages?”

Shortly afterwards, about a month ago, Brendan Dawson of Durban told me about his experience.

When he flew on Mango airlines from Cape Town to Durban on October 25, his suitcase arrived at King Shaka airport looking a lot worse for wear.

“The multi-directiona­l wheel component had broken off and was lying next to the bag on the carousel, and a section of the plastic hard shell of the bag had also broken off, exposing the inside lining of the bag.”

He was directed to the Mango baggage service desk, where a consultant inspected the damage and then asked if he’d taken insurance on the luggage.

“When I said I hadn’t, he told me there was nothing he could do, as it was Mango’s policy they were not liable for certain instances of damage – one being when the wheel ‘comes off’.” Dawson was incensed. “The wheel had not ‘come off’ – the bag had been negligentl­y handled. It has a crack around the damaged area showing there was trauma at the point of damage.”

Many calls and e-mails to Mango later, Dawson’s had no recourse. The bag is beyond repair and will have to be replaced – at his cost.

So I took up the issue with Mango spokesman Hein Kaiser, pointing out that regardless of whether or not passengers chose to pay the airline an extra R25 for insurance on their baggage, they are protected by the CPA, should their luggage be damaged.

Responding, Kaiser said Mango’s terms and conditions of carriage “does limit airline liability to a certain extent”.

“This is in line with airline policy and practice across the industry and, as a low-cost airline, we offer the additional option to guests to insure their travel and items of a personal nature at a small additional cost.”

The complex nature of airport baggage handling – part mechanical and part manual – and factors such as weather conditions could cause wear and tear and “some unintended damage”, Kaiser said.

“And bags with protrusion­s, such as wheels, may incur greater wear and tear.”

Kaiser pointed out that “baggage matters” are dealt with three times in Mango’s terms and conditions.

Given that Mango is not alone in its policy, I turned to the Airlines Associatio­n of SA for comment.

But its chief executive Chris Zweigentha­l chose not to.

“I am not in a position to make a general statement on such issues.”

It’s not the only low-cost air ticket policy which falls foul of the CPA. The Act says a consumer can cancel an advanced booking for a refund, minus a “reasonable” cancellati­on fee. The airlines will allow you to cancel and rebook another low-cost flight, for an extra fee, but they do not refund airfares, and the regulators turn a blind eye. SO WHAT TO DO? ● Pay the extra R25 (in Mango’s case) for the airline’s insurance, so they’ll take responsibi­lity for repairing or replacing your bag or suitcase should it get damaged in transit; or

● Make sure your luggage is specified on your short-term insurance policy;

● Do what many frequent flyers do – never check your luggage in: with good planning and discipline you can even travel overseas with only a carryon. It means no waiting for luggage and no lost or damaged bags in transit.

● If the airport carousel delivers you a damaged suitcase, and the airline refuses to take responsibi­lity for it because you didn’t pay for their insurance, lay a complaint with the Consumer Goods & Services Ombud. www.cgso.org.za

CONTACT WENDY: E-mail: Twitter:

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? DOES NOT FLY: Airlines in SA refuse to take responsibi­lity for luggage damage
DOES NOT FLY: Airlines in SA refuse to take responsibi­lity for luggage damage
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa