Daily Dispatch

Daily Dispatch

Monstrousl­y awful debacle

-

IN THE article opposite this editorial opinion, our Wednesday columnist, Bantu Mniki, laments the reprehensi­ble behaviour of the executive management and the board of yet another faltering state-owned enterprise. Rightly so. It beggars belief that 11 fat cats at PetroSA were given the green light to bleed R17.3million out of a taxpayer-funded company that is R14.5-billion in the red and is now slashing jobs by almost 40%.

Even worse when one considers that the R14.5-billion loss sustained by Petro SA in the 2014/15 financial year is the biggest loss notched up by a South African state-owned entity.

Further, it accrued not from one failed project, but from a parade of catastroph­es.

Imagine that – a shambles so vast and so costly that Prasa’s too-tall-train debacle, at a mere R2.65-billion, is diminished to singletrac­k dwarfdom.

Consider too what it must have taken to earn the notorious status of the country’s biggest-loss making SOE – surpassing an entire stable of parastatal­s which lurch between the credit ratings agencies like permanent patrons from a real-life shebeen.

But then, the extent of PetroSA’s gemors should not surprise anyone when the style of its oversight is considered.

That the board was fully aware of the severity of PetroSA’s condition cannot be disputed. Just one month ago it sought to withhold from parliament’s energy committee the gory results of a comprehens­ive forensic audit report on the massive losses. Instead it offered “an executive summary”.

To their credit the parliament­arians did not buy it, but finally a compromise was reached and the board was allowed to make its presentati­on behind closed doors with Energy Minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson.

The point here is that this very same SOE oversight body, knowing full well the extent of the financial haemorrhag­ing, bought into a so-called “legal opinion” that said “affordabil­ity would not qualify as a justifiabl­e reason” not to pay bonuses to its executives.

On that basis the maleficent 11 were empowered to dance towards Christmas with their pockets disproport­ionately bulging.

It is a saga so ludicrous that it would be comedic were it not for the pain inflicted on punch-drunk taxpayers, not to mention the poor, who are punished more than all.

But perhaps even more disquietin­g than the unjustifia­ble rewards for failure that were revealed on the pages of the Sunday Times at the weekend, has been the response from the helm of government.

Up until last night the silence was deafening. Not even the suggestion of a vacuous investigat­ion.

For citizens, the experience of being cast into a silent void is not a pleasant one. And in that space of drift it is difficult to disregard the possibilit­y that an entirely different message is being sent to the ordinary inhabitant­s of a Thuli Madonsela-deprived South Africa.

One that says quite simply: Suck it up!

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa