Daily Dispatch

BSA implores promoters pay up – or else

- By MESULI ZIFO

A ROW is raging between Boxing SA and Eastern Cape Boxing Promoters Associatio­n (ECBPA) over the money owed by the promoters that could lead to the region being refused the right to hold tournament­s.

The two bodies are embroiled in a R2.8-million dispute that BSA says the promoters owe due to unpaid levies since 2004.

This when BSA passed a regulation that required promoters to cede 5% of their sponsored tournament­s and 10% if the shows secure broadcast rights.

Some promoters from other provinces have been adhering to the regulation while those from the Eastern Cape are objecting to its interpreta­tion. They are arguing that the BSA should be entitled to the percentage of the nett and not the gross amount.

ECBPA admitted that it did not agree with the interpreta­tion of the regulation as promoters were not revenue generators for BSA.

“The primary task is to ensure that there is boxing activism and key to that being realised is all boxing promoters who are developing boxing and businessma­n and women as well in the space,” the associatio­n argued.

“There is a fundamenta­l administra­tive and unconstitu­tional flaw in BSA interpreta­tion of the regulation.

“The Act and regulation talks about a promoter submitting a reconcilia­tion of events after the fight but BSA wants promoters to cede 5% and 10% of the sponsorshi­p amount without taking into account promoters expenses on purses, flights, logistics, sanctions and other related logistics.”

When BSA sent out letters to some promoters last September demanding acknowledg­ement and arrangemen­ts to repay their respective debt some sought the interventi­on of the parliament’s sports portfolio committee which invited the regulatory body to a meeting for an explanatio­n.

BSA chief executive Tsholofelo Lejaka confirmed that the body appeared before the committee to explain the matter.

“After hearing our own explanatio­n the committee respected our decision and encouraged us to engage with the promoters,” he said.

However, no solution has been found as yet despite the two parties holding numerous meetings that even involved their legal teams.

ECBPA are steadfast in its conviction that the regulation should be applied after all the costs of the tournament have been settled.

“Imagine when a promoter gets R100 000 sponsorshi­p and his purses are 150 000. Other costs are R100 000 so he has to take his own money to bridge the gap but still has to pay BSA 5%,” the associatio­n said.

The associatio­n denied that other promoters in other provinces have no problem with the regulation, emphasisin­g that the perception was drawn from the fact that they have no organised structure like the Eastern Cape.

“It's not true that it's only Eastern Cape promoters who have an issue,” they said.

“It is just that we are organised and are more present on these issues but we as ECBPA have been talking to different promoters of other provinces and are still talking even today with them and we are still on the same page.”

The provincial associatio­n is hoping to share its interpreta­tion of the regulation with other promoters from other provinces during the scheduled meeting with BSA in Johannesbu­rg this Friday.

The R2.8-million has now been flagged by the auditorgen­eral as boxing in the country is governed by the South African Boxing Act.

Lejaka said among others, the AG cited the flawed revenue collection of the body as one of its shortfalls to tighten up its expenditur­e.

Asked how long will BSA tolerate the ECBPA objection, Lejaka replied: “We have been patient with the associatio­n for a while now because we do not want to be seen as bullying it. But there comes a time when we will have to stamp our authority.”

Lejaka admitted that the saga could force BSA to take drastic steps to recover the money.

“This is part of compliance issue that licensees must adhere to and we know what we should do when they fail to do so,” he said.

While Lejaka refused to give a list of promoters owing the money, it is understood that one of them owes a whopping R1.5-million.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa