Trump’s new travel ban
Poor security, lack of cooperation with US blamed
PRESIDENT Donald Trump issued a new openended travel ban Sunday that saw North Korea, Venezuela and Chad among a list of eight countries cited for poor security and lack of cooperation with United States authorities.
The new restrictions replace an expiring 90-day measure that had locked Trump in political and legal battles since he took office in January over what critics alleged was an effort to block Muslims from the country.
But the White House stressed that the measure was to protect the US from terror attacks.
“We are taking action today to protect the safety and security of the American people by establishing a minimum security baseline for entry into the United States,” Trump said in a statement.
“We cannot afford to continue the failed policies of the past, which present an unacceptable danger to our country. My highest obligation is to ensure the safety and security of the American people, and in issuing this new travel order, I am fulfilling that sacred obligation.”
Sudan, one of the six majorityMuslim countries on the original ban, was removed from the list.
The US has recently praised Sudan’s efforts in fighting terrorism ahead of a decision expected in October on whether to lift decadesold sanctions on Khartoum.
Full bans were newly placed on nationals from North Korea and Chad, and extended for five coun- tries on the original list: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen.
Limited restrictions meanwhile were placed on Venezuela, for officials from government agencies including interior and foreign ministries, the main police and intelligence services, and other agencies. Trump’s order said Caracas was not cooperating on security issues.
Officials speaking on background stressed that the decision was taken after an extensive review of high-risk countries by the Department of Homeland Security, which were all given the opportunity to improve their security standards.
The DHS report also said that Iraq did not meet its baseline security requirements. But because Baghdad is a close ally and supports the presence of large numbers of US troops and civilians, officials said, the White House opted not to place Iraq on the list. But US-bound travellers there will face much tougher vetting.
“If you can’t screen people effectively to know who’s coming into your country, then you shouldn’t allow people from that country to travel,” said White House National Security Adviser HR McMaster.
Trump administration officials stressed that the restrictions are “conditions-based, not timebased”, indicating that significant improvements by countries could see them delisted from the ban.
The officials also said the addition of North Korea and Venezuela demonstrated that the measure was based on security standards and was not a “Muslim ban”, as detractors have argued.
That accusation was accepted by federal appeals courts in lawsuits that blocked the first efforts by Trump to set the ban, in January and March. The ban, which also included a broader, 120-day ban on refugees that expires next month, will be argued in the Supreme Court on October 10.
“Religion, or the religious origin of individuals or nations, was not a factor,” a senior government official told reporters.
“The inclusion of those countries, Venezuela and North Korea, was about the fact that those governments are simply not compliant with our basic security requirements.”
The bans for the five countries from the previous 90-day order, which expired on Sunday, would continue under the new order. For North Korea, Chad, and Venezuela, the restrictions will be implemented starting October 18. — AFP