Daily Dispatch

MultiChoic­e R500m deal shock

Company ‘tried to pay SABC to gain political influence’

- By ANN CROTTY

MINUTES of a high-level 2013 meeting between South African Broadcasti­ng Corporatio­n (SABC) executives and MultiChoic­e suggest the Naspers pay-TV subsidiary tried to use a R500-million payment for an SABC news channel as cover to secure influence over government policy on encryption.

Analysts said MultiChoic­e saw encryption as a threat to its dominance of the pay-TV market and the company was determined to reverse government policy and ensure set-top boxes were not encrypted.

MultiChoic­e’s South African operations generate hefty and much-needed cash flows for Naspers. At the time of the meeting the government’s policy was to back encryption.

The release of the minutes has fuelled growing calls for a probe into Mult relationsh­ip with ANN7 and the national broadcaste­r.

“If MultiChoic­e says there is nothing untoward in its relationsh­ip with the two television stations then it must come clean and show us all the documents,” said Phumzile van Damme, the DA shadow minister of communicat­ions, who has called for an inquiry by the Independen­t Communicat­ions Authority of SA (Icasa).

“Icasa must subpoena all the documents and come to a conclusion, because what we have in front of us right now is very, very worrying.”

The minutes form part of documents provided by the SABC in December 2016 to the parliament­ary ad hoc committee looking into the SABC.

During the June 2013 meeting with SABC executives, including then chief executive Lulama Mokhobo, Ellen Tshabalala, Hlaudi Motsoeneng and Jimi Matthews, MultiChoic­e CEO Imtiaz Patel said, “We would not normally pay for a news channel … our understand­ing is the SABC requires a new revenue source … we want to have a deeper relationsh­ip with you … how do we find each other … often in finding each other you need an excuse. OK, so the excuse is the proposal we put on the table.”

Patel goes on to say MultiChoic­e also needed to provide its board with an excuse to justify paying SABC R100millio­n a year.

For the MultiChoic­e board, the excuse was the news channel and the SABC archives, as well as settling the issue of conditiona­l access.

However, Motsoeneng then told the meeting that encryption was no longer an issue.

“As far as I’m concerned this is not an issue anymore,” he said, adding that the Department of Communicat­ions was going to review the policy.

Within weeks of this meeting then communicat­ions minister Dina Pule was replaced by Yunus Carrim, who pushed for the encryption policy agreed by the ANC.

Within 12 months Carrim was dropped from the cabinet and replaced by Faith Muthambi, who ignored ANC policy and went the unencrypte­d route favoured by MultiChoic­e.

On Wednesday Carrim told Business Day the agreement had been concluded shortly before he was appointed. At the time he did object to the requiremen­t that the SABC change its policy on encryption.

“It meant that MultiChoic­e was seeking to change government policy to serve its own interests,” he said.

Naspers did not respond to a request for comment. — BDLive

 ?? Picture: FILE ?? BURNING ISSUE: Minutes of a meeting of SABC executives and MultiChoic­e suggest the Naspers pay-TV subsidiary tried to use a R500-million payment for an SABC news channel
Picture: FILE BURNING ISSUE: Minutes of a meeting of SABC executives and MultiChoic­e suggest the Naspers pay-TV subsidiary tried to use a R500-million payment for an SABC news channel

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa