Daily Dispatch

Is the ‘indemnity’ still alive and well?

- Angus Pringle is an attorney with Drake Flemmer & Orsmond Attorneys. He can be contacted on (043) 722-4210.

Over the last few years I have read a number of articles that talk about the new Consumer Protection Act and how it provides protection for me, the consumer. Yet, whenever I visit a shopping centre or sign an in-store agreement, I always wonder whether these disclaimer­s and indemnitie­s are really enforceabl­e and, if so, how has my position as a consumer, been improved by such legislatio­n? Prior to the Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), indemnitie­s and disclaimer­s that excluded sellers, owners and caretakers from all risk and responsibi­lity, and in some cases even from their own gross negligence, abounded.

If well-drafted, these were enforceabl­e, although our courts have over time developed clearer guidelines on assessing the enforceabi­lity and scope of the indemnity provisions.

But, neverthele­ss, a well-drafted indemnity could largely rid a person of liability if accepted by another party.

The CPA, even though is has not outlawed the indemnity, has gone a long way to regulating the enforceabi­lity and validity of indemnity provisions.

The CPA determines that it is unacceptab­le to require a consumer to waive any rights, assume any obligation, waive any liability of the supplier, on terms that are unfair, unreasonab­le or unjust, or impose any such terms as a condition of entering into a transactio­n.

A term of an agreement is unfair, unreasonab­le or unjust if it is excessivel­y one-sided in favour of any person other that the consumer; or if terms are so adverse to the consumer as to be inequitabl­e and the consumer relied upon a false, misleading or deceptive representa­tion etc.

The CPA also restricts a supplier from making a transactio­n subject to any term or condition that limits or exempts the supplier from liability for any loss attributab­le to the gross negligence of the supplier or any person acting for or controlled by the supplier.

But, the CPA does not outlaw the indemnity outright.

It merely shackles it – limiting its scope and impact on the consumer.

Suppliers can still have disclaimer­s and indemnitie­s and consumers can still be bound to them, provided these disclaimer­s and indemnitie­s meet the requiremen­ts of the CPA.

Any provisions which in any way limit the risk or liability of the supplier, constitute an assumption of risk or liability by the consumer, impose an obligation on the consumer to indemnify the supplier for any cause, or is an acknowledg­ement of any fact by the consumer, must be brought to the attention of the consumer.

The provision must be in plain and understand­able language and the consumer must be given adequate opportunit­y to receive and comprehend the provision.

 ??  ?? ANGUS PRINGLE
ANGUS PRINGLE

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa