Daily Dispatch

Don’t be misled by labels – devil is in the detail

- CONTACT WENDY: E-mail: consumer@knowler.co.za Twitter: @wendyknowl­er WENDY KNOWLER

HOW label fluent are you? When it comes pack descriptio­ns, knowing the language of the regulation­s can bag you the most bang for your buck.

Given the cost of toilet paper, most of us shop around for the cheapest pack, but if you don’t look beyond the price, you’re very likely to end up buying the most expensive toilet paper on the market.

“I don’t know if you’ve written about this,” Bandi Mchunu asked me via Twitter last week, posting a photo of a pack of “Aloe Vera” toilet paper. “I got shocked just now. To think we were once at 500 sheets.”

Actually all two-ply rolls used to be 350 sheets, and most still are. But in 2002, the regulation compelling South Africa’s toilet paper makers to produce no fewer than 350 sheets per roll was amended to allow for 200 sheet rolls as well, provided the number is disclosed on the pack.

Some of those smaller-roll packs are labelled “Mini” so make it very clear to consumers that the seemingly good price is thanks to the fact that each roll is substantia­lly smaller, but not in this case. The price for the nine-pack was the same – R59.99 – for the standard nine-pack of Baby Soft and the “Aloe Vera” variant.

Only sharp-eyed shoppers such as Mchunu would spot that the one has 350 sheets and the other just 200, making the Aloe Vera pack far more expensive.

When the new regulation came into force, the South African Tissue Manufactur­ers Associatio­n justified the move like this: “What these changes ultimately mean to the consumer is that they will now be able to purchase toilet rolls at a cheaper price point due to the reduction in sheet count of the new offerings.”

Translatio­n: you’re paying less, getting less, and the cost per sheet makes this the most expensive toilet paper on the market.

Bottom line (I couldn’t resist that): always check the sheet count when you’re buying toilet paper.

The same goes for tissues: those boxes all look the same size, but some contain 200 tissues, others 180 or 150. Beware of the words “more affordable”.

Supermarke­t aisles are full of products which are regulated in terms of their definition­s, most of which are lost on the average consumer.

Take tuna, for example.

You may know that shredded tuna is the most inferior of the canned tunas, but do you know the difference between tuna chunks and solid tuna?

Canned tuna is regulated by the National Regulator of Compulsory Standards, so the descriptio­ns are anything but random. With tuna chunks, no more than 30% of the drained contents can be pieces of less than 12mm.

A product described as solid tuna can’t have more than 18% of “free flakes” in the can, and the contents must turn out of the can in a single portion.

So the solid tuna is the most superior of the three, and knowing that can open your eyes to real bargains on the shelf.

Last week, for example, I spotted the Pick n Pay brand 170g solid tuna cans selling for R3 less than the tuna chunks ones. Often they are the same price, so knowing which is the superior product helps you make the best choice.

The legal definition­s behind pet food descriptio­ns are also illuminati­ng, and I daresay lost on most pet food buyers.

Given that dogs and cats are carnivorou­s, what you should be looking for – apart from the price per kg – is a product with the highest meat content.

So here’s what those descriptio­ns on the packs mean in terms of legislated meat content, using chicken as the example:

● With chicken flavour – up to 4% chicken;

● With chicken – at least 4% chicken;

● High/rich in or with extra chicken – at least 14% chicken.

In my local Spar there are two 1.75kg packs of dog food selling side by side. One, described as “with chicken flavour”, is priced at R116,99, and the lesser known brand is described as “rich in chicken and rice” – in other words, a meatier product, for far less – R69,99.

And so on to fruit juice: a question I often get from readers who’ve read the label of a “100%” fruit juice is: “How can a product described as 100% juice have all that other stuff in it?”

Fair question. The answer is because the regulation­s allow for it.

Legally, a 100% juice must consist of the natural juice of the named fruit or fruits, but it may also contain permitted preservati­ves, citric acid, ascorbic acid, carbon dioxide and natural essences or aromas.

Most of the “100% juice” is reconstitu­ted: juice from fruit such as apples, grapes and oranges is extracted and then concentrat­ed by removing the water via evaporatio­n to reduce the volume and protect shelf-life, and then, for ready-to-drink consumptio­n, the concentrat­e is diluted again before bottling.

If it’s freshly squeezed fruit juice you’re after, with no additives at all, the descriptio­n to look for is “fresh fruit juice”.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa