Daily Dispatch

Who must prove they are working properly?

- Sonja Nel Sonja Nel is an attorney with Drake Flemmer & Orsmond Attorneys. Contact: 043-722-4210.

“I’ve really tried to cut down on my water consumptio­n and over the last year it’s been very low.

However, over the past three months my municipal water accounts suddenly more than tripled. Knowing this cannot be right, I queried my accounts with the municipali­ty.

They said the consumptio­n was correct according to my water meter and I must pay or my water would be cut off. The only explanatio­n I have is that the water meter is not working correctly. But whose responsibi­lity is it to verify this?”

Our courts recently had to address a similar set of facts in the case of Euphorbia (Pty) Ltd t/a Gallagher Estates v City of Johannesbu­rg.

In this case, the applicant (Gallagher Estates) was sued by the municipali­ty for several million rand, which the municipali­ty alleged was owed to it as a result of water and sewage charges due and payable by Gallagher Estates to the municipali­ty.

Gallagher Estate’s response was that the charges that the municipali­ty was seeking to recover were based on a faulty water meter and accordingl­y that these amounts were not lawfully owing.

One of the issues before the court was whether the duty of proving that the consumer was incorrectl­y or correctly billed lies on the consumer or the municipali­ty.

In the case, it was found that Gallagher Estates was legally not allowed to remove and test the meter because the legal entitlemen­t was reserved for the municipali­ty.

Accordingl­y, because the applicant was not in the possession of all the informatio­n that it needed to prove that the meter was not functionin­g properly due to the fact that only the municipali­ty was legally entitled to remove and test the meter, it would be unfair in law to burden the applicant with the responsibi­lity of proving that the meter was not functionin­g, as it would be much easier for the municipali­ty to prove that the meter was working than for the consumer to prove that it was not.

From this case, it can be deduced that in metering disputes with a municipali­ty, it is not the consumer’s responsibi­lity to prove that the charges billed are wrong or based on a non-functionin­g meter.

It is rather the municipali­ty’s responsibi­lity to first prove the charges are correct and based on a functionin­g meter. If a consumer disputes the alleged consumptio­n and lodges a query, the burden then rests on the municipali­ty to investigat­e the issue, and the meter, if necessary, to confirm whether the alleged amounts billed are correct.

In your case, we would advise lodging a formal query with the municipali­ty to investigat­e the meter, and should they not adhere to the request, to then through your attorney inform the municipali­ty of their responsibi­lity to do so as stipulated in the above case.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa