Daily Dispatch

Court tries to see surrogacy from a child’s perspectiv­e

- Sonja Nel

“Acting as a surrogate is a selfless and generous act towards parents who cannot conceive their own child. But what about existing children of a surrogate mother and the impact surrogacy may have on them? Should this not also be considered?”

Surrogate motherhood agreements are thoroughly regulated by legislatio­n in SA, and for good reason, as there are several very complicate­d and intricate issues involved.

Section 295 of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 determines that for a court to confirm a surrogacy agreement, the surrogate mother must have a documented history of at least one viable delivery, and also have a living child of her own.

The court must also be satisfied that confirmati­on of the agreement is justified in terms of the personal circumstan­ces and family situations of all the parties concerned.

In a recent judgment of Ex Parte JCR and Others the Court ruled that the existing children of a women who agrees to act as a surrogate mother, must be psychologi­cally assessed to determine what the impact of the surrogate pregnancy would have on them.

The prospectiv­e surrogate mother in this matter was married and had two children of her own, aged 10 and 7 years old. This was not the first time that she would act as a surrogate mother, the first time being when the children were 6 and 3 years old.

The judgment reads: “Each time the third applicant carries a child as a surrogate, they are confronted by their mother’s pregnancy which does not end in a child being brought home from the hospital to join their own family. My concern was therefore: how healthy, psychologi­cally, is it for children of surrogates to go through this process?”

The judge held that every surrogacy applicatio­n affects not only the rights and interests of the unborn child but also those of the children that are already part of the family unit of the surrogate and (sometimes) the commission­ing parents.

In arriving at its decision, the court considered the interests of the child and how a surrogate pregnancy affected the surrogate mother’s own child/children, considerin­g that they had to watch her pregnancy for nine months, knowing she is carrying a child, seeing her go to hospital to deliver the baby and then coming back home without a baby.

From this judgment, a welcome new requiremen­t has now been laid down for surrogacy applicatio­ns, namely that where there are children born to the surrogate (the surrogates’ own children) it is in the best interests of those child(ren) for purposes of confirmati­on of the agreement that they be psychologi­cally assessed.

If it is found that the surrogacy may have a harmful effect on their psychologi­cal wellbeing, this would be a factor that a court would be able to weigh up in the considerat­ion of whether the agreement should be confirmed or not.

In this case the assessment found that both children were proud of the fact that their mother assisted other couples in becoming families and that they did not ask to see the babies as they become older.

Accordingl­y, the court confirmed the surrogacy agreement.

Disclaimer: This article is the personal opinion/view of the author and is not necessaril­y that of the firm.

The content is provided for informatio­n only and no action should be taken on the basis thereof without a legal advisor. The firm and author cannot be held liable for any damage resulting from action taken on the basis of this content without written confirmati­on by the author.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa