Floating cities concept slowly approaching reality
IT IS an idea at once audacious and simplistic, a seeming impossibility that is now technologically within reach: cities floating in international waters – independent, self-sustaining nation-states at sea.
Long the stuff of science fiction, “seasteading” has in recent years matured into something approaching reality, and there are now companies, academics, architects and even a government working together on a prototype by 2020.
At the centre of the effort is the Seasteading Institute, a nonprofit organisation based in San Francisco. Founded in 2008, the group has spent about a decade trying to convince the public that seasteading is not a crazy idea.
That has not always been easy. At times, the story of the seasteading movement seems to lapse into self parody. Burning Man gatherings in the Nevada desert are an inspiration, while references to the Kevin Costner film Waterworld are inevitable.
But with sea levels rising because of climate change and established political orders around the world teetering under the strains of populism, seasteading can seem not just practical, but downright appealing.
Earlier this year, the government of French Polynesia agreed to let the Seasteading Institute begin testing in its waters. Construction could begin soon and the first floating buildings – the nucleus of a city – might be inhabitable in just a few years.
“If you could have a floating city it would essentially be a start-up country,” said Joe Quirk, president of the Seasteading Institute. “We can create a huge diversity of governments for a huge diversity of people.”
The term seasteading has been around since at least 1981 when avid sailor Ken Neumeyer wrote a book called Sailing the Farm that discussed living sustainably aboard a sailboat. Two decades later the idea attracted the attention of Patri Friedman, grandson of economist Milton Friedman.
Friedman, a freethinker who had founded “intentional communities” while in college, was living in Silicon Valley at the time and was inspired to think big. So in 2008 he quit his job at Google and co-founded the Seasteading Institute with seed funding from Peter Thiel, the libertarian billionaire.
In a 2009 essay, Thiel described seasteading as a long shot, but one worth taking. “Between cyberspace and outer space lies the possibility of settling the oceans,” he wrote.
The investment from Thiel generated a flurry of media attention, but for several years after its founding, the Seasteading Institute did not amount to much. A prototype planned for San Francisco Bay in 2010 never materialised, and seasteading became a punchline to jokes about the techno-utopian fantasies gone awry, even becoming a plotline in the HBO series Silicon Valley.
But, over the years, the core idea behind seasteading – that a floating city in international waters might give people a chance to redesign society and government – steadily attracted more adherents. In 2011, Quirk, an author, was at Burning Man when he first heard about seasteading.
He was intrigued by the idea and spent the next year learning about the concept.
For Quirk, Burning Man, where innovators gather, was not just his introduction to seasteading. It was a model for the kind of society that seasteading might enable.
“Anyone who goes to Burning Man multiple times become fascinated by the way that rules don’t observe their usual parameters,” he said.
The next year, he was back at Burning Man speaking about seasteading in a geodesic dome. Soon after that, he became involved with the Seasteading Institute, took over as president and, with Friedman, wrote Seasteading: How Floating Nations Will Restore The Environment, Enrich The Poor, Cure The Sick and Liberate Humanity From Politicians.
Seasteading is more than a fanciful hobby to Quirk and others involved in the effort. It is, in their minds, an opportunity to rewrite the rules that govern society.
“Governments just don’t get better,” Quirk said. “They’re stuck in previous centuries. That’s because land incentivises a violent monopoly to control it.”
No land, no more conflict, the thinking goes.
Even if the Seasteading Institute is able to start a handful of sustainable structures, there’s no guarantee that a utopian community will flourish. People fight about much more than land. And though maritime law suggests that seasteading may have a sound legal basis, it is impossible to know how real governments might respond to new neighbours floating offshore.
– New York Times
The idea that a floating city in international waters might give people a chance to redesign society and government has steadily attracted more and more adherents.