Diamond Fields Advertiser

President faces massive backlash

- LEBOGANG SEALE STAFF WRITER

AS PRESIDENT Jacob Zuma faced another round of criticism in Parliament yesterday, a fresh wave of backlash raged over his utterances that teenage mothers be removed from their babies until they have completed their schooling.

Reiteratin­g the controvers­ial statements he made during his 2009 election campaign, Zuma said on Tuesday that teenage girls must be taken far away from their babies.

“They (teenage girls) must be taken away and forced to go to school, far away,” the president said in his response to the debate on his address to the House of Traditiona­l Leaders.

Zuma’s statement drew criticism from children’s rights and social welfare activist organisati­ons. Katharine Hall, a senior researcher at the University of Cape Town’s Children’s Institute, said Zuma’s utterances were absurd.

“The President’s suggestion to remove the babies of young mothers from their care is clearly ludicrous and uninformed, presumably made in jest to build rapport with traditiona­l leaders he was addressing in Parliament,” Hall said.

She added that the idea of separating children from their mothers was “inappropri­ate and unhelpful” because the legislatio­n gives young women the right to return to their education after giving birth.

Zuma is known for his traditiona­l views, which are often at odds with South Africa’s constituti­on. In 2012, the Commission on Gender Equality ruled against Zuma for his statement that it was a problem in society for a parent to stay with an unmarried daughter.

Zuma, while acknowledg­ing that his initial statement had sparked controvers­y, was unrepentan­t on Tuesday.

“The women protested, I want to take their kids away from them and blah, blah, blah.

“So I kept quiet, because I was saying in no way can you have young kids being mothers of other kids and young boys being fathers of kids – they know nothing of it.”

The President said allowing teenage mothers to leave school early was an untenable burden on society and the State’s social welfare bill.

Hall said Zuma’s statements were an indication of the general misconcept­ions about the trends in teenage pregnancy in the country.

“First, there is a widespread belief that teenage pregnancy is an escalating problem. This is not true. Fewer teenagers have babies nowadays than they did in earlier times,” she said.

Lisa Vetten, a research associate at the Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research, said the President’s utterances were appalling.

“It’s shocking that the Head of State can make these policy pronouncem­ents in contradict­ion to his government policy and programmes.

“It’s most unfortunat­e that people scapegoat teenage girls for anything and everything that’s wrong in the country. If he (Zuma) was to read research, he would see that teenage girls don’t fall pregnant because they are bored, stupid or want to irritate their parents.”

The DA called on Zuma to retract his statement.

Presidenti­al spokesman Mac Maharaj said Zuma had not singled out girls for criticism.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa