Financial Mail

The poor need more champions

Cosatu and SACP strangely quiet about Gigaba budget

- @anncrotty

One has to ask what SA is coming to. Right now the DA appears to be the loudest opponent to what has been described as possibly the most regressive budget since 1994. The party is rallying its troops to fight the one percentage point increase in Vat announced by the minister of finance last week. It’s also opposing the hike in transport levies.

“We will not support a regressive and anti-poor policy by the ANC and will be launching a national petition to say ‘no’ to Vat and transport levies,” said DA leader Mmusi Maimane soon after Malusi Gigaba announced the first Vat increase in 25 years.

There’s also been a commendabl­e pushback from civil society, but there hasn’t been the traditiona­lly raucous response from the big guns — Cosatu and the SACP, which we could always rely on to churn out righteous indignatio­n at the drop of a hat.

Within hours of the budget, parliament­ary finance committee chairman Yunus Carrim was talking about a pushback; he said the increase wasn’t a done deal until it had been approved by parliament, hinting at the possibilit­y that, for the first time since 1994, the budget might not be approved in its entirety. But that position seemed to be toned down in the following days.

Sadly, Maimane’s loud opposition to the move may have killed any hope of a reversal. The reality is that as much as the ANC’S rank-and-file MPS feel instinctiv­ely opposed to a Vat increase, they will not want to be seen to be backing a Da-led campaign. It’s not just about Vat.

In a submission to the standing committee and select committee on finance, a group of civil society organisati­ons and Wits University corporate strategy & industrial developmen­t programme researcher­s point out that taxes on excise duties and the fuel levy have risen significan­tly in recent years, while the general long-term trend in corporate income tax and personal tax (despite recent modest increases) has been downward or flat.

“This indicates that taxes that hit the poor hardest are rising faster than taxes that mainly target higher income earners and companies.”

The increase in social grants does not come close to relieving the additional pressure from these taxes — in large part because a substantia­l chunk of those most affected don’t qualify for grants. And zero-rated foodstuffs account for only about 45% of average food consumptio­n by the poor.

Like most South Africans I am heartily sick of paying what feels like a lot of tax and not seeing much for it. I’ve been unhappy with even the modest personal income tax increases of recent years largely because they’ve been accompanie­d by the outlandish and wasteful behaviour of the Jacob Zuma government. I’ve also felt frustrated by the general presumptio­n that ever-increasing social grants are the only solution to SA’S deeply ingrained problems and so must be embraced.

They should certainly not be the only solution, but a regressive tax policy will do nothing more than aggravate the problem. The poor shouldn’t have to rely on the DA to protect them from this.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa