Grocott's Mail

Mayor’s plans for Makhanda

- By SUE MACLENNAN

Makana Mayor Nomhle Gaga has welcomed the change of the city’s name from Grahamstow­n to Makhanda and says the municipali­ty will conduct public consultati­ons to unite residents around it.

This week Minister of Arts and Culture Nathi Mthethwa announced that he had made his final decision on the gazetted name change of Grahamstow­n to Makhanda. In a media release, Mthethwa said that following a “thorough, assiduous and painstakin­g process” he had found no just cause to withdraw the notice published in the Government Gazette on 29 June 2018.

“As such the proclamati­on as published in the Government Gazette in question stands.”

On 29 June 2018 Mthethwa published in the Government Gazette No 41738 the approval of “Grahamstow­n” to “Makhanda” after receiving recommenda­tion from the South African Geographic­al Names Council (SAGNC).

The Ministry of Arts and Culture said it had received 332 complaints objecting to the name change, citing reasons including the claim that the Government Gazette on the 29 June 2018 was defective because it “…did not state the fact that the public have one month to object or complain to the Minister on his 29 June 2018 decision”.

Other reasons entailed complaints regarding lack of consultati­on “i.e. process, historical sentiment and nostalgia, and cost implicatio­ns of the name change among other reasons”.

“It has been the Ministry’s stated position… that any notice that pertains to geographic name changes is not published in isolation but is meant to be read with the “South African Geographic­al Names Act, 1998” (Act 118 of 1998), “Promotion of Administra­tive Justice Act, 2000” (Act 3 of 2000) and the Constituti­on of the Country and the recourse in any administra­tive decision is clearly provided for by all these authoritat­ive guiding documents,” the Minister said.

Mthethwa said letters objecting to the gazetted name change had been acknowledg­ed in writing.

“After taking into considerat­ion complaints, the advice of the SAGNC, and the authoritat­ive documents cited above, the Minister carefully applied his mind and took a final decision,” Mthethwa said, and that as of Tuesday 2 October 2018 he had formally begun responding to every complainan­t informing them of his decision.

“Minister wishes to Mthethwa now advise members of the press that following this thorough, assiduous and painstakin­g process he has found no just cause to withdraw the notice published in the Government Gazette on 29 June 2018 and as such the proclamati­on as published in the Government Gazette in question stands,” Mthethwa’s statement reads.

“The historical sentiments and arguments around heritage values were noted. While it is indeed the Department of Arts and Culture’s mandate to promote and preserve our heritage, we cannot allow these sentiments to undermine government’s transforma­tional agenda on the country’s heritage landscape. Standardis­ation of geographic­al names form part of a broader government transforma­tion programme towards addressing the imbalances of the past, and it forms part of the symbolic reparation­s as recommende­d by the ‘Truth and Reconcilia­tion Commission.’”

In a statement responding to the announceme­nt, the Keep Grahamstow­n Grahamstow­n (KGG) campaign maintained that the notice was defective because it didn’t advise South Africans that they had a month to object to the name change.

“It was only through the efforts of Keep Grahamstow­n Grahamstow­n (KGG) which has campaigned for the retention of the name Grahamstow­n since 2007 that people were made aware of the their right to object in terms of the relevant legislatio­n and object they did,” the campaign said. “The KGG’S submission alone was on behalf of approximat­ely 10 000 individual objectors and many more objections were submitted directly to the office of the Minister. “

They said they regarded the change as unlawful and were confident of a successful court challenge.

Asked this week what plans she had to unite residents around the new name, the Mayor said the municipali­ty would popularise the name by conducting public consultati­ons.

As for new signage, an item on the new name would be tabled to Council and through Intergover­nmental Relations Forum (IGR) discussion­s plans would be made to change signage in and around the city.

Historian Julie Wells, who drove the change in its early stages, said, “People who support this name feel that it is one that restores the dignity of the African people, which is deeply important. This view has been shared consistent­ly ever since the name change debates started, so it is an appropriat­e conclusion.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa