Mail & Guardian

Battle to rebuild laundry won

The Rand Steam Laundries structures, one of a kind on the Reef, were demolished illegally in 2008

- Ra’eesa Pather

On the corner of Barry Hertzog and Napier streets in Richmond, Johannesbu­rg, a dilapidate­d shed occupies an otherwise vacant piece of land. The buildings that once stood there were demolished in 2008.

In the late 19th century, the location marked the growth of black entreprene­urship. Zulu men from KwaZulu-Natal travelled to Johannesbu­rg, latching on to any opportunit­ies the fledgling mining town presented.

The West Rand’s mining industry was growing and, making use of the stream that flowed through the area, these migrants washed the clothes of black mineworker­s to earn a living and became known as AmaWasha.

Washing took place along the banks of the Gas Works Spruit — that is, until Rand Steam Laundries rolled in, leaving the AmaWasha without work. Some of the migrants were forcibly removed to sites far from the blossoming business area, signalling the beginnings of colonial segregatio­n.

The company was based there until it was shut down in 1962. The buildings, some of the first examples of industrial architectu­re in the city, were declared provincial heritage sites and protected.

But Imperial Holdings demolished the buildings in 2008 to make way for a car dealership.

Civil society reacted strongly. The Johannesbu­rg Heritage Foundation led the backlash. Plans to turn the site into a motor showroom were halted and the foundation successful­ly pushed for the City of Johannesbu­rg to put a stop to any developmen­t on the site for 10 years, leaving Imperial to pay rates and levies on land they could not use.

“The decision [to halt developmen­t] was taken because the Provincial Heritage Resources Authority Gauteng had never received any applicatio­n from Imperial. The demolition­s were done without approval and were therefore illegal,” said the Gauteng department of sport, arts, culture and recreation.

Although Imperial did not face any legal penalties for demolishin­g a heritage site, the foundation’s vicechairp­erson, Flo Bird, says the decision cost the company.

“Imperial didn’t walk away unscathed. For eight years they paid rates on the building and they weren’t allowed to develop. That’s very heavy actually, and they [have admitted] that it cost them a fortune.”

The foundation says it had negotiated an agreement with Imperial for the buildings to be reconstruc­ted, along with a commemorat­ion site for the AmaWasha. Bird says the company tried to make amends but it couldn’t make the numbers work and was forced to sell the land.

“Reconstruc­tion is very difficult and it’s not something that people do willingly. No heritage person will willingly agree to reconstruc­tion but, in this instance, we don’t have a choice. The buildings are gone.

“We were determined that no one was going to get away with demol- ishing buildings that had been provincial­ly protected and then do nothing about it,” Bird says.

A large billboard, for the Moolman Group, now occupies a spot on the site: “Rand Steam Laundries, new retail office/developmen­t coming soon … TO LET”.

Willem Reitsma, Imperial’s group treasurer, says t he company’s attempts to rebuild the heritage buildings and commemorat­ion site were aborted when Imperial was hit by declining motor sales in 2015. This, and increased building costs, left them with no option but to sell the property.

Bird estimates that Imperial would have had to have dropped their sale price by at least R85-million — the projected cost of the rebuilding. She says the project may take 10 years to complete but “it would be worth it to reconstruc­t the Rand Steam Laundries as they were in their original form”.

Brian McKechnie of McKechnie Keeling Heritage Consultant­s, who is involved in putting together a conservati­on plan for the site with the aim of replicatin­g the original structures as closely as possible, says the buildings were one of a kind.

“There aren’t really other good examples of turn-of-the-century steam laundry buildings in Johannesbu­rg,” he says.

The buildings were characteri­sed by their large warehouse structures, double-volume interiors and red brick exteriors. The ventilatio­n structures on the roofs were also typical of industrial architectu­re of that time.

But it’s not just the design and constructi­on of the buildings that were lost in the demolition.

“There’s also social history that was lost in terms of erasing that whole landscape where the AmaWasha site was as well,” McKechnie says.

The best way to penalise developers is to levy a financial penalty on them, he says.

“The only way you can fine a developer is if you go to court and the judge would have to determine the value of the fine,” he adds.

After years of negotiatio­ns, Imperial and the Johannesbu­rg Heritage Foundation reached an agreement and the town planning scheme was amended. This sets out the rules and regulation­s for developmen­ts in Johannesbu­rg.

This means the Rand Steam Laundries buildings must be reconstruc­ted and a commemorat­ion site built — and the property’s owners have to foot this bill.

“It has been a long time that we have had to suffer with this bare land but, you know, you have got to jump through these hoops,” Bird says.

The most important lesson is that heritage is always worth fighting for, and the battle can be won no matter how big the opponent, she says.

At the site, cigarette butts, empty wine bottles and other rubbish are strewn around. The grass is overgrown. The only echo of the burgeoning industry that once existed there is a filtration tower and a shed.

 ?? Photo: Troy Enekvist ?? AmaWasha’d out: Little remains of the Rand Steam Laundries, once a classic example of period industrial architectu­re.
Photo: Troy Enekvist AmaWasha’d out: Little remains of the Rand Steam Laundries, once a classic example of period industrial architectu­re.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa