Mail & Guardian

Women forced into sterilisat­ion

For many African women, the ability to bear children decides their social standing and access to inheritanc­e

- Tabitha Griffith Saoyo Photo: Finbarr O’Reilly/Reuters Tabitha Griffith Saoyo is the programme manager for sexual reproducti­ve health and rights at the Kenya Legal & Ethical Issues Network on HIV and Aids

Children are the hallmark of many marriages. Across the African continent, children are a source of pride and sometimes a determinan­t of the wealth and inheritanc­e a widow is entitled to after the death of her spouse.

Without a child, a family is often seen as incomplete. In many communitie­s, women who do not have children don’t have a say in how decisions are made — they are literally the last person to speak at communal gatherings.

For all these reasons, the forced or coerced sterilisat­ion of women living with HIV — a troubling trend that has been recorded in Kenya, Uganda, Namibia, Botswana and South Africa — is an injustice that for most victims is harder to accept than their HIV status.

That sterilisat­ion is held up as a way to reduce the risk and prevalence of HIV infection compounds this injustice, because there is no scientific basis for that claim.

Thanks to modern and scientific­ally evolving obstetric and infant feeding practices, HIV-positive women can give birth to healthy, HIV-negative babies.

Additional­ly, reducing the risk of HIV transmissi­on is best accomplish­ed with the use of antiretrov­iral drugs; consistent condom use; and partner counsellin­g, testing and treatment, among other methods.

Sterilisat­ion is done with a surgical procedure known as tubal ligation during which a woman’s fallopian tubes are severed or blocked to prevent pregnancy permanentl­y.

When a patient voluntaril­y requests this procedure, it is an acceptable form of long-term contracept­ion. When conducted without the full, free and informed consent of the patient, however, sterilisat­ion violates a woman’s human rights.

Considerab­le suffering has been associated with involuntar­y childlessn­ess. Sterilised women generally face extreme stigma — such as greater rates of gender-based violence, and abuse from their partners and communitie­s.

In 2014, the World Health Organisati­on and several United Nations bodies issued a joint statement on eliminatin­g forced, coercive and otherwise involuntar­y sterilisat­ions. They explicitly condemned the practice, noting that the obligation of states to protect people from such treatment extends into the private sphere, including where such practices are committed by healthcare profession­als. This has largely been echoed by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. But the practice persists. In Kenya, a report from the African Gender and Media Initiative documented the experience­s of 40 women living with HIV who were forced or coerced into undergoing permanent sterilisat­ion.

For some, the procedure was done without their knowledge during emergency caesarean sections; others The gift of a child: One of the reasons forced sterilisat­ion has been so hard to eradicate is that women in many African countries have been reluctant to speak up about it. But changes are happening and the bravery of Kenyan women has inspired others on the continent. signed consent forms during active labour or after being coerced into believing that sterilisat­ion was necessary before they could receive food or medical care for their children.

The organisati­on where I work represents five of these women who have sued various healthcare institutio­ns after being forcibly sterilised or coerced into agreeing to the procedure.

Not long ago, I asked a doctor in Nairobi whether she performed forced sterilisat­ions. “We don’t do it anymore,” she said. “Did you ever do it?” I asked. “Of course,” she said. “Most of us did it, thinking we were saving the lives of these women.”

Unfortunat­ely, sterilisat­ions continue, especially in Kenya’s rural areas. The country’s government — although publicly condems the practice — has never made any effort to prevent doctors from committing this blatant infringeme­nt on women’s autonomy.

Meanwhile, about 1.5-million people in Kenya — mostly women and children — are living with HIV, according to UNAids. These numbers tell us what science made clear long ago: forced sterilisat­ion does not decrease new HIV infections.

In other words, we can’t even say that the suffering of women who have been forcibly sterilised was for a good cause.

One of the reasons forced sterilisat­ion has been so hard to eradicate is that women in many countries have been reluctant to speak up about it.

In Kenya, we have broken the silence. The petitioner­s, in our case, accompanie­d by other women who were also sterilised, attend every single court proceeding and, in some cases, travel overnight to do so. Their bravery has inspired others.

In Uganda, the Internatio­nal Community of Women Living with HIV Eastern Africa recently completed a comprehens­ive study on involuntar­y tubal ligation. Earlier this year women in South Africa, led by the Women’s Legal Centre, filed a case challengin­g the practice.

We can never give back what was taken. But we can do our best to ensure that other women are not robbed of their future children.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa