Mail & Guardian

Corruption reports’ content known but remain ignored

- Pauli van Wyk —

The content of the three Precca reports are not new revelation­s to the Hawks, strengthen­ing concerns that they are reluctant to investigat­e the Guptas.

In August 2015 telecoms provider Neotel submitted the Precca report to the Hawks after its involvemen­t in a Transnet kickback scandal was revealed. Neotel paid two instalment­s worth R41-million, including value added tax, to the Gupta-affiliated company Homix, which offered to secure a lucrative Transnet IT contract worth more than R300millio­n for Neotel.

After the revelation­s, in 2010 the Neotel board ordered an investigat­ion, and the facts were widely publicised in the media.

The Hawks are not reliant on complaints from the public, but are empowered to initiate their own investigat­ions.

More than a year later, in November 2016, another Precca report was submitted to the Hawks, this time by Regiments, a rival company of Trillian Capital Partners. It provides evidence that includes alleged fabricated invoices and service agreements. The attached documentat­ion is alleged to point to a money-laundering scheme, in which R17.1million was washed through the Guptas’ newspaper The New Age.

The report was leaked shortly after it was submitted to the Hawks and was widely publicised in the media.

The third Precca report was submitted to the Hawks in July 2016 by the business rescue practition­ers of Optimum Coal Holdings and Optimum Coal Proprietar­y, referred to extensivel­y in the State of Capture report.

Alerted by informatio­n revealed in media reports by amaBhungan­e and Carte Blanche, this Precca report alleges how a latenight teleconfer­ence meeting by Eskom officials saved the Gupta’s plan to acquire Optimum. Eskom is alleged to have agreed to prepay the Gupta company Tegeta R586millio­n for coal yet to be delivered. Eskom’s interventi­on filled Tegeta’s shortfall in the R2.15billion deal. Eskom’s prepayment to help out the Guptas was also widely published in the media and the public protector’s report. Gordhan of 72 suspicious transactio­n reports red-flagged by the Financial Intelligen­ce Centre (FIC).

Mulaudzi said that “on the Financial Intelligen­ce Centre matter we can confirm that we are investigat­ing several matters which were brought to our attention”.

This contradict­s a letter of January 17, signed by Hawks boss Major General Mthandazo Ntlemeza, which indicated the unit was not investigat­ing the FIC transactio­ns.

Though Madonsela made no findings in her state capture report, she brought the evidence gathered in her investigat­ion to the attention of the Hawks.

The FIC has refused to provide further detail to the Hawks about the 72 re-flagged transactio­ns, which would complicate a Hawks investigat­ion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa