Mail & Guardian

Zuma-linked mine dealt legal blow

- Sipho Kings

The high court in Pretoria has ordered that mining company Atha-Africa give environmen­tal civil society groups three weeks’ written notice before it starts mining in a protected area, which will give them crucial time to fight the permits the mine will need before it starts operations.

The Mabola Protected Environmen­t — where Atha-Africa wants to mine — is particular­ly symbolic in the struggle between mining and water in Mpumalanga. About twothirds of that province is under a prospectin­g or mining licence.

Mabola, with its rivers, wetlands and giant waterfalls, is the source of the Vaal, Pongola and Tugela rivers. These supply water to Gauteng, Mozambique, KwaZulu-Natal and much of South Africa’s Highveld.

The court order came after a coalition of eight groups approached the court with an urgent interdict applicatio­n, challengin­g the decision by Mineral Resources Minister Mosebenzi Zwane to give Atha-Africa a mining right in the Mabola Protected Environmen­t. Mabola is about 50km northeast of Wakkerstro­om and covers 8772 hectares.

By declaring the area a protected environmen­t, the government was ensuring that mining could only happen when both the environmen­t and mining ministers gave their permission. This seemed improbable.

But then came Atha-Africa and its black economic empowermen­t (BEE) partner, the Bashubile Trust. Two of its trustees are Sizwe Christophe­r Zuma and Vincent Gezinhlizi­yo Zuma. Besides their surnames, various things link them to the president. One is the fact that Sizwe Zuma has cited the Bryntirion Estate (the presidenti­al compound in Tshwane) as his residentia­l address. Most reports list the two as the president’s nephews.

In arguing against Atha-Africa and its BEE partner being given a mining right, the civil society coalition said the proposed 15-year coal mine would cause “unacceptab­le pollution and degradatio­n of the environmen­t”. But their main point to the court was that a “poor decision-making process” had led to the granting of the right.

To back this up, the coalition filed documents that showed how junior officials in the minerals department had said the mining right should not be granted, but were overruled by senior officials. The water and sanitation department also gave the mine a water use licence, after initially opposing the applicatio­n by AthaAfrica to get a mining right.

In justifying her granting of environmen­tal rights, Environmen­tal Affairs Minister Edna Molewa said: “The Mabola region is both a critical water catchment area and a biodiversi­ty priority area. Thus, mining and its associated activities in this area are also strictly regulated in terms of our mining and biodiversi­ty guideline.”

The environmen­t, water and mineral resources department­s were all listed as respondent­s in the high court applicatio­n. But none of them opposed it, leaving it up to AthaAfrica to defend.

Initially, Atha-Africa opposed the applicatio­n, even demanding a punitive cost order against the civil society coalition and their attorneys from the Centre for Environmen­tal Rights. But eventually the parties reached an agreement, which was then made a court order.The mining company said the agreement was to find a “practical solution”.

In effect, this gives the civil society coalition more time to fight the different applicatio­ns that Atha-Africa has had to submit to mine in the Mabola Protected Environmen­t.

The coalition is appealing the Mpumalanga government’s decision to grant environmen­tal authorisat­ion for the mine. Atha-Africa has opposed this appeal and a hearing is being scheduled on the matter. Until then, the authorisat­ion is suspended.

Another appeal is being prepared against the mine’s applicatio­n to change the land use classifica­tion for where it wants to mine — from agricultur­al to mining.

In April, the Pixley ka Seme district municipali­ty told the company to apply again for the land use change because its applicatio­n was legally flawed. Atha-Africa did this in June but the municipali­ty has not sent that informatio­n on to interested and affected parties.

The civil society coalition is also appealing the approval given by the minerals department for AthaAfrica’s environmen­tal management programme and the granting of a water use licence to the mine.

All of this represents a sustained move by civil society to oppose what has hitherto been a rubber-stamping process for mining rights applicatio­ns throughout South Africa.

Mpumalanga has been the worsthit province, but the courts have started changing this. In March, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled against the granting of a prospectin­g right for Barberton Mines in the Barberton Nature Reserve.

Other cases have gone against the government, with its decisions to grant licences overturned because it had not followed due process.

In the case of Mabola, the different branches of the fight against the mining right being granted in a protected area rely on the argument that due process has not been followed.

If they are successful in any one of these actions, the eight civil society groups will be able to stop mining in one of South Africa’s most important sources of clean water.

Civil society is opposing what has been a rubberstam­ping process for mining rights

 ??  ?? Photo: Anthony Schultz
Photo: Anthony Schultz
 ??  ?? Prospectin­g prospects: With much of Mpumalanga’s land already being used for mining, activists are now fighting an applicatio­n to mine a tract of protected wetland near Wakkerstro­om. Photo: Lawrette McFarlane/GO!/ Gallo Images
Prospectin­g prospects: With much of Mpumalanga’s land already being used for mining, activists are now fighting an applicatio­n to mine a tract of protected wetland near Wakkerstro­om. Photo: Lawrette McFarlane/GO!/ Gallo Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa