Mail & Guardian

Is era of parastatal paralysis over?

The SABC shake-up and ANC shift bode well for the reform of other public enterprise­s

-

The dramatic and swift overhaul of the SABC by the new board could signal that it is the first domino to fall in clearing out the rot at corrupted state-owned entities, and its path to restoratio­n could well serve as a blueprint for other bedevilled parastatal­s.

An interim board took over the SABC just four months ago and has quickly gone to work to address key problems and people within the troubled organisati­on.

Critically, it oversaw a disciplina­ry process that led to the dismissal of self-proclaimed messiah and the broadcaste­r’s recurring nightmare, Hlaudi Motsoeneng, followed by the dismissal of chief executive James Aguma.

The interim board has reworked financial arrangemen­ts, including suspending payments to the board itself, until the broadcaste­r’s finances have been stabilised.

It has also overturned the previous board’s decision to challenge the public protector’s report, which made damning findings against Motsoeneng and the SABC.

“We hope we have given the country hope,” interim chairperso­n Khanyisile Kweyama told the Mail & Guardian this week.

She said the board would now pursue other findings of wrongdoing against Motsoeneng and others, as detailed in the public protector’s report. This would not necessaril­y mean taking the matter to the police but civil action could be taken, such as issuing summonses for monies owed, Kweyama said.

The SABC would also assist the Special Investigat­ing Unit in its investigat­ion of the SABC, although this is waiting to be signed off by the presidency. (See “SIU can’t act without the president’s okay”.)

The report’s findings against Motsoeneng include how he advised the board on his own salary increases, which climbed from R1.5-million a year to R2.4-million in a single year. He was also found to have purged the organisati­on of his detractors, costing R29-million in settlement and legal fees.

In the case of the SABC, a parliament­ary inquiry was conducted three years after the public protector’s report, although it was for other fraudulent behaviour and resulted in the parliament­ary committee putting an interim board in place. The inquiry was initiated by an ad hoc committee and not the communicat­ions committee.

Former public protector Thuli Madonsela found Motsoeneng was enabled by a board that must have been corrupt or incompeten­t itself.

Former SABC chairperso­n Ben Ngubane, who only recently stepped down from Eskom amid the exposure of graft, was found to be instrument­al in tailoring the job requiremen­ts for the public broadcaste­r’s chief operations officer specifical­ly to accommodat­e Motsoeneng’s lack of matric.

The key to clearing out the rot in any institutio­n was ensuring good governance, Kweyama said. “Good governance is absolutely critical, and a refusal to listen to anything but what is the right thing to do.”

Ensuring policies were in place, as well as consequenc­es for breaking them, were key to this, she added.

But unlike the SABC, Eskom remains saddled with compromise­d individual­s in executive positions, though a process similar to that followed at the SABC is now unfolding at Eskom in double time.

For Eskom, the public protector’s State of Capture report, released in November, has led directly to a parliament­ary inquiry, whose terms of reference were finalised by the public enterprise­s committee this week.

It was determined these would be broadened to include state capture relating to various public enterprise­s, especially Denel and Transnet. The Gupta brothers and even President Jacob Zuma’s son, Duduzane, would be called as witnesses, it decided.

Public enterprise­s committee chairperso­n and ANC MP Zukiswa Rantho said legal experts would be brought in to conduct the interviews.

Asked whether there was a consensus among ANC MPs, Rantho said: “The ANC MPs are on board. It is them that initiated the inquiry so they are very excited to be going ahead with it.”

Phumzile van Damme, the Democratic Alliance’s spokespers­on on communicat­ions and a member of the parliament­ary committee on communicat­ions, said she had to push very hard for the inquiry into the SABC to take place. “The ANC originally didn’t want that to happen,” she said.

Former communicat­ions minister Faith Muthambi put up many barriers to prevent a probe, she said. “Gavin Davis, in the committee before me, was blocked at every turn on the issues he tried to fix there.”

For parliament­ary committees to launch seemingly credible inquiries to tackle corruption within the state is new.

“We have never seen this before,” said political analyst Ralph Mathekga. “I also think the enthusiasm with which the MPs are tackling this issue is very strange, especially coming from ANC MPs.”

The main driver of these inquiries is factional battles within the ANC.

“Some members have decided not to abandon the ANC. Instead, they

 ??  ?? Looking up: The interim SABC board has quickly gone to work to address key problems at the broadcaste­r. Photo: Delwyn Verasamy
Looking up: The interim SABC board has quickly gone to work to address key problems at the broadcaste­r. Photo: Delwyn Verasamy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa