Mail & Guardian

We need our own Nobel and an academy

- Zukiswa Wanner

It is almost six years since I moved to Kenya. And every September for a few days before the announceme­nt of the literature laureate there is an air of hope pervading conversati­ons among the “woke”. It is possibly the only time that Kenyans offline and online discuss whether this will be the year. Will this be the year that the great old man of Kenyan letters, Ngugi wa Thiong’o, wins it?

Many Ngugi admirers all over the world weigh in and articles that could probably make an anthology have been written on why he deserves it and why this is definitely his year.

Even those who last read him as a set book in high school or, worse, have never read him and only know him as the guy who wrote about decolonisi­ng also weigh in. And then after the prize announceme­nt, commentary on how he was robbed of the prize. Now I know there are plenty of problems with the Nobel literature prize, as is likely with any prize, but Ngugi winning or not winning should not be one of them.

A resident of the United States, Ngugi this year visited and had speaking engagement­s at South African universiti­es to discuss decolonisa­tion and the importance of African languages. As a continent, however, we have not seen fit to bring him back so that he can be immersed in the decolonisa­tion project.

We have not found it worthwhile to keep him here for any length of time except for guest appearance­s, so that he can hear the linguistic changes in his Gikuyu mother tongue. Instead, he lives in the US, where he went into exile many years ago and we have not matched conditions on the continent to allow for him to come back. (A shout-out here to the University of Johannesbu­rg’s literature department for bringing us back another older man of letters, Wole Soyinka).

Ngugi’s rhetoric therefore becomes difficult for many of us living on the continent because he is not here to lead us in the correct way. And so too with many of our best and brightest with whom we have been frustrated until they left for lands where they are more appreciate­d.

We are okay with our academics and scientists being paid less than politician­s and sometimes even dare to call them sellouts when they leave for favourable conditions instead of fighting for better treatment. We become complacent and are content when our leading brains give intellectu­al succour to our former colonial masters and neocolonis­ers while our countries could very well do with the benefit of their knowledge.

Then after those colonial masters and neocolonis­ers have taken from us because we have failed to sustain our brightest and best, we then have the audacity to beg that they invite us to their table and make one of our own their special dinner guest. Why?

The Nobel prizes are as internatio­nal in much the same way as the Bretton Woods institutio­ns are internatio­nal. We cannot cry when they do not award one of ours in much the same way as we cannot cry about Bretton Woods institutio­ns giving us ridiculous interest rates on loans. Their organisati­ons, their rules, their accolades. Although colonialis­m caused much damage, maybe it’s time we start working on ourselves so that we think differentl­y about this African project.

We live on a continent where one of the richest men has a foundation that gives away $5-million dollars annually to retired African presidents. Let that sink in for a minute. Retired presidents who still get pensions from their countries, who get paid vulgar amounts of money for consulting on governance and who have the privilege of recognisab­le names should they choose to go into business. These, then, upon retiring “honourably” as per term of office of their national Constituti­ons, get rewarded.

It is telling of African democratic spaces, though, that for the past few years the foundation has not found a former president among our 54 countries to give the prize to. But I suppose we cannot fault Mo Ibrahim for his little contributi­on.

We can only ask why Ibrahim’s fellow billionair­es, the likes of Oppenheime­r, Dangote, Dos Santos or Sawiris, who often talk a good game about being African entreprene­urs and this being an African century, have not seen fit to set up an academy that celebrates and propels the various African achievemen­ts to the next level? Call it an African academy with each of them making an endowment for a particular field: chemistry, mathematic­s, music, physics, medicine, literature, etcetera.

Such a prize would not only be truly ours but it may even do a lot to curb the brain drain because those who win it choose to stay and give back to their field of excellence — assuming there are more leaders who choose to win Ibrahim’s leadership award and make it comfortabl­e for our bright minds to work without political hindrance.

Equally important, our African billionair­es may find some of the innovation­s of these amazing minds useful to get them even more business. What’s there to lose?

I am not holding my breath that there will not be collective hope before the announceme­nt of the Nobel literature prize. I am also under no illusion that there will no longer be disappoint­ments when Ngugi does not win.

Yet I cannot personally help hoping that, instead of this yo-yo of emotion over some Swedish and Norwegian prize, we would start having conversati­ons with our own Nobels who are alive in these times to consider doing some of these things for their home continent.

It costs so little but would go a long way and would immortalis­e them in our hearts and minds for centuries to come.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa