Mail & Guardian

UCT embarks on ‘historic’ TRC process

But students are wary that they’ll bear the brunt and that the university won’t be held to account

- Ra’eesa Pather

In an environmen­t where trust is at an “all-time low”, the University of Cape Town (UCT) is beginning its own process of truth and reconcilia­tion to address unresolved tensions over transforma­tion and disciplina­ry action against student protesters. But it risks further fracturing a university community in which students and the executive are still suspicious of each other.

UCT council chair Sipho Pityana has described the university’s establishm­ent of an Institutio­nal Reconcilia­tion and Transforma­tion Commission (IRTC) this week as “historic”. The IRTC is meant to be UCT’s own version of South Africa’s Truth and Reconcilia­tion Commission (TRC), with the aim of helping the university identify where it has failed to transform and how outstandin­g disciplina­ry processes against students can be reconciled.

A steering committee of students, staff, workers and the executive was formed in 2016. It met for more than a year to discuss and formulate how an IRTC could work.

This came after UCT student protesters had demanded a TRC after the #Shackville protest led to five students being interdicte­d from setting foot on campus, and a number of others being suspended and excluded from the academic programme. During #Shackville, the students erected a shack on the university’s busy Residence Road to highlight housing shortages, and burned artworks in protest against colonial symbolism on campus.

Although nearly two years have passed since #Shackville, students and the executive still remain deeply distrustfu­l of one another, and conflict has arisen over the IRTC’s terms of reference. The terms include amnesty for student protesters who had received clemency for breaking university rules, restorativ­e justice in outstandin­g cases, looking into the #Shackville protest and others, and asking for submission­s on decolonisa­tion, labour relations and the university’s culture when it comes to gender inequality, race, sexuality and disability.

Rorisang Moseli, the student representa­tive council (SRC) president from 2016 until mid-2017, was on the steering committee. He fears the burden will be on students to admit their wrongs and ask for forgivenes­s, and that the university won’t be held to account for its own wrongdoing.

“The process can easily be liberalisi­ng if it overdemand­s those who are victims to forgive,” Moseli says.

Pityana acknowledg­es that the terms of reference do not create the same expectatio­n of the university management and staff as they do of students, but says the commission­ers could change them. The IRTC process, he says, is happening at a time when trust is at its lowest, but he hopes that the commission­ers can help students and staff reconcile.

The steering committee recently appointed five independen­t commission­ers to run the IRTC: former TRC commission­er Yasmin Sooka, former Constituti­onal Court justice Zak Yacoob, gender rights activist Yvette Abrahams, former science and technology minister Mosibudi Mangena and violence and reconcilia­tion researcher Malose Langa.

Pityana admits that the IRTC process nearly fell apart because of distrust between students and the university executive. Last year, the committee deadlocked on a number of occasions over the terms of reference of the IRTC and the deployment of private security guards on campus while the committee was meeting. Students and senate members also accused each another of racism.

Mlingani Matiwane, a student who was the #Shackville representa­tive on the steering committee, says that at one point Pityana got so frustrated that he told students: “We’ll do it without you.”

Pityana confirms there was a period when all stakeholde­rs were on board with the IRTC process, except the students. “I said to them what I said to senate: ‘If you don’t come on board, we will have to move on.’ There was a point where senate also caused problems because they were suspicious of the students,” he says.

The need for a Shackville TRC was proposed in June 2016 by Brian Kamanzi, who was part of the #RhodesMust­Fall movement to remove the Cecil John Rhodes statue on campus, after five students were interdicte­d from entering UCT property and could not finish their degrees. A number of others were suspended or academical­ly excluded.

The case of the five students, known as the Shackville Five, went all the way to the Constituti­onal Court, where the justices upheld a judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal that the students’ conduct during the protest was “harmful and unlawful” to the university.

Students protested throughout 2016, demanding that the expelled students be allowed to return to campus, prompting Kamanzi to launch a campaign for a Shackville TRC.

Kamanzi says he was ignored at first. It was only in September that the university buckled after prolonged protests, leading to what has now become known as the IRTC.

The IRTC will be very similar in structure to the country’s TRC in that it seeks restorativ­e justice and the transforma­tion of a society, in this case the one at the university.

Although Pityana hopes it will successful­ly “displace apartheid” culture that lingers on campus, some students remain wary.

Matiwane believes the university set up the IRTC to secure vice-chancellor Max Price’s legacy rather than to genuinely reconcile with students. Price’s tenure ends in June. “I’ve heard that this thing is a legacy project for Max Price,” says Matiwane.

Kamanzi and Moseli say they have heard similar rumours from students and staff. In May 2017, Kamanzi penned an article published by the Mail & Guardian in which he accused UCT of using the IRTC as a “proxy war” to rewrite its history of antagonism with students.

Price was overseas this week and could not respond to questions, but Pityana is confident that the IRTC is an initiative that is bigger than just Price. “The constituen­cies that brought this to bear are led by forceful leaders who have strong views,” Pityana says. “This ranges from students to workers to academic staff to members of council. If they didn’t want this to happen, it wouldn’t have happened simply because Max Price has deemed it appropriat­e to have this as his legacy.”

It is unclear when the IRTC hearings will begin but the commission could take up to 12 months to conclude its work. For Matiwane, the IRTC comes too late, because the students most affected by disciplina­ry processes have already left UCT.

In November 2016, the university and #Shackville students came to an agreement. In order to return to campus and finish their studies, students facing disciplina­ry action could sign a declaratio­n acknowledg­ing that violent protest was wrong and apologisin­g for their actions. Their academic transcript­s would still show that they had broken university rules.

With these agreements in place, Matiwane says there’s no need for amnesty because students who protested in 2016 have now mostly left campus with their degrees — and an IRTC would mean that R5-million would be spent on a process that had already been resolved.

Pityana says it could even cost the university more than that but adds that if the process succeeds, then the underlying causes of protests, such as inclusivit­y, would be dealt with.

Although Matiwane maintains a bleak outlook on the IRTC, Moseli believes it can work. The danger he sees, however, is that once it concludes its work, it will be up to the university council to decide what recommenda­tions will be implemente­d.

“My greatest concern is that this lands up in a really protracted process that ends up in a report that isn’t implemente­d or has no consequenc­es, just like our own TRC within the country,” Moseli says.

 ??  ?? Dealing: Vice-chancellor Max Price’s tenure at UCT ends in June, and reports suggest he wants to leave on a high note by embracing the new Institutio­nal Reconcilia­tion and Transforma­tion Commission. Photo: David Harrison
Dealing: Vice-chancellor Max Price’s tenure at UCT ends in June, and reports suggest he wants to leave on a high note by embracing the new Institutio­nal Reconcilia­tion and Transforma­tion Commission. Photo: David Harrison

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa