Mail & Guardian

Education Fee-free education isn’t enough

-

After some uncertaint­y, South Africa learnt last week that, over the next three years, free tertiary education will be phased in for students from households that earn less than R350 000 a year. More than 340000 students at universiti­es and almost 420000 full-time students at technical and vocational education training colleges will be funded from a budget allocation of R57-billion from the South African government.

Although this is a significan­t step in educating South African youth, it leaves philanthro­pists and other funders to assume that students currently supported by scholarshi­p programmes will now be taken care of under the new free education dispensati­on.

But, in this time of transition and uncertaint­y, it is premature for any funder to change strategy, pull out of funding higher education or shut down their programmes. On the contrary, students still need our support to make it through university and on to successful careers.

It’s no secret that students who finish university do better in life than those who don’t. But after seven years of leading the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation’s university success work in South Africa, I can tell you that supporting students to graduation and beyond is a complicate­d equation that takes funding and a whole lot more.

Our Dell Young Leaders programme offers hundreds of students from disadvanta­ged background­s financial, academic and psychosoci­al support to earn their degrees and secure employment. It’s a successful model but it takes significan­t planning, student tracking, targeted interventi­ons, advanced analytics and more to achieve the programme outcomes — a 90% graduation rate and 100% employment of all graduates.

For most foundation­s, trusts, corporates and individual­s who collective­ly invest more than R1.2-billion annually in universiti­es and students, the news about free tertiary education raises questions about whether there is still a need for their contributi­ons.

To these individual­s and donors, I can tell you: there certainly is. Funding will need to be directed at increasing efforts that focus on university completion and graduate employment.

Why? Because the needs of students will remain. The free education policy will not translate into students being more prepared for university, nor will it improve graduation rates (which are reported at 36.9% for National Student Financial Aid Scheme students and just over 52% for all students). And it won’t prepare students for employment.

Free education will remove the barrier of registrati­on fees, eliminate the burden of not knowing how to pay for university, and allow graduates to contribute financiall­y to their families soon after they graduate and find employment without having to pay back a loan. But free education will put significan­t pressure on students to succeed academical­ly within regulation time.

Foundation­s, trusts, corporates and individual­s will still be required to use their resources to remove the barriers for matriculan­ts to go to university, and to support those who are likely to face strict exclusion policies aimed at preventing the system from being clogged by those unlikely to graduate in regulation time.

Lecturers and support services providers will probably reach a breaking point dealing with the vast number of students not able to cope with the pressure. Funding will be required to aid teaching and learning programmes, because vice-chancellor­s working with limited budgets have to ensure the institutio­ns continue to operate and quality and standards are maintained.

The bottom line is that universiti­es will need students to graduate on time. The government will need to see a return on the investment of free education. South Africa will need new taxpayers to sustain free education.

Donors and their programme staff who administer scholarshi­ps should know that there is an urgent need to focus on helping students to be successful. Here are some ways to leverage government’s investment by ensuring measurable positive effects:

• University preparatio­n: There is an opportunit­y to use donor resources to prepare matriculan­ts for tertiary education with programmes that can offer career guidance and assist them in choosing the right course at the right institutio­n.

• Student support: Providing free tertiary education for students who emerged from a low-quality school system will ultimately be selfdefeat­ing in the absence of adequate support. This support does not only encompass extra tuition but also a wide range of psychosoci­al support measures, academic developmen­t training and practical assistance with daily needs.

• University completion: Supporting students to graduation is hard work. Academic underprepa­redness, combined with stagnant or ever-shrinking staff to cope with the crisis, will have a negative effect on the academic journey of any student, particular­ly first-generation university students. There is an opportunit­y to partner with department­s and faculties to develop specialise­d completion programmes that can catch students before they fail and provide incentives for students at the most challengin­g points of their academic journey to promote on-time graduation.

• Graduate work readiness: There is a strong preference in the workplace for hiring graduates with at least some work experience.

Scholarshi­p providers can invest in capacity developmen­t of the poor or often nonexisten­t careers services at our universiti­es.

There is an opportunit­y to build programmes that target profession­al developmen­t to narrow the gap between university and the workplace. Corporate bursary programmes can use their resources to create internship­s and vacation work to offer real experience that can build a CV and open doors for students.

With the alumni of the Dell Young Leaders programme, we’ve seen the effect that access to relationsh­ips, mentors and opportunit­ies can have on a graduate who has no personal support system or network.

• Graduate placement enablers: Free education will not get a student to an interview or provide the tools for an aspiring entreprene­ur to succeed. There is an opportunit­y to fund enabling programmes that offer practical support like clothing for an interview, transport to interviews, as well as relocation and bridging finance for students who have little disposable income because they are starting their first job.

At the Michael & Susan Dell Foundation, we embrace the possibilit­ies offered by free education, and we remain committed to helping disadvanta­ged students to complete university and succeed in the profession­al world. But without sustained support for all aspects of higher education, thousands of young people will be unable to live up to their potential. That’s why I encourage all donors to stay the course and continue to work with the universiti­es they supported in the past on how best to serve students in this new environmen­t.

The next few months will bring lots of uncertaint­y but there are opportunit­ies to accelerate our efforts aimed at university completion and graduate employment. South Africa’s students deserve it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa