Mail & Guardian

Life Esidimeni: ‘Traitors must face the law’

After being awarded damages, distraught families want more: Qedani Mahlangu must be prosecuted

- Mia Malan

The R135-million in constituti­onal damages awarded to claimants in the Life Esidimeni tragedy this week — the largest award of its kind in South Africa’s history — could increase to 10 times that amount.

Former deputy chief justice Dikgang Moseneke’s arbitratio­n ruling is also likely to influence future rulings of this kind.

Constituti­onal damages of R1-million each were awarded to 135 claimants, in addition to funeralrel­ated expenses and R180000 for shock and psychologi­cal trauma.

Moseneke ruled that it was “appropriat­e relief and compensati­on for the government’s unjustifia­ble and reckless breaches” of at least six sections of the Constituti­on and “multiple contravent­ions” of the National Health Act and the Mental Health Care Act.

Between October 2015 and June2016, 1711 psychiatri­c patients in Gauteng were transferre­d from private Life Esidimeni health facilities, for which the state had paid, to largely ill-equipped community organisati­ons with little to no experience in caring for mental health patients.

The move came after the provincial health department ended a 30-year contract with the Life Healthcare private hospital group.

The department ignored repeated warnings from families and civil society organisati­ons that transferri­ng patients to unqualifie­d organisati­ons, which Moseneke referred to as “death and torture traps” in his arbitratio­n ruling, could lead to the death of psychiatri­c patients.

As a result, 144 patients died, and 1418 were exposed to “trauma and morbidity” but survived, according to the arbitrator’s report.

Moseneke ruled the sites were “hand-picked” by senior Gauteng health department officials, such as then health MEC Qedani Mahlangu and her head of department, Dr Tiego “Barney” Selebano, with an “irrational and arrogant use of public power”.

All claimants received the same award, regardless of whether their loved ones died or survived.

But the number of claimants is now likely to increase from the original 135, after Moseneke invited those who hadn’t been part of the arbitratio­n — at least 1 350 of those who survived didn’t join — to come forward.

“Not all have joined the process. When they find their voice or way, I trust that the government would choose to meet their claim in terms identical to the award than to set up new litigation of another arbitratio­n process,” Moseneke said in his arbitratio­n award.

Within a day after the ruling, 10 more families and patients had already contacted the arbitrator’s office. “I’ve taken down their details, and sent it through to the mental health director in the Gauteng health department to determine if they qualify for the award,” spokespers­on Obakeng van Dyk said.

In order to qualify, patients should have suffered trauma directly as a result of the transfers and should be able to prove that they or their loved ones were transferre­d between October 2015 and June 2016.

There have been two major constituti­onal damages awards in the past, but these were significan­tly smaller than the Life Esidimeni award and were made in court cases and not by arbitratio­n agreement.

In 2006, the Eastern Cape high court ordered the welfare MEC in the province to pay “Mrs Kate” damages for failing to process and pay her disability grant within a reasonable period”, after the state had taken 40 months to do so.

And in 2005, the department of agricultur­e and land affairs had to pay constituti­onal damages to a private company in Benoni, Modderklip Boerdery, after the Constituti­onal Court ruled that the state had failed to protect Modderklip against the unlawful occupation of its property.

Although the size of the award wasn’t specified, the ruling stipulated that it could not exceed the property’s value, which was less than R1.8-million.

Because the Life Esidimeni award is an arbitratio­n award, which is a private agreement between two parties, it can’t set a legal precedent for courts.

But, it will undoubtedl­y “set a standard”, says advocate Adila Hassim, “because constituti­onal damages this high have never been awarded before”. Hassim was part of social justice organisati­on Section27’s legal team that represente­d 63 of the Life Esidimeni claimants.

Sasha Stevenson, who was also part of the team, agrees: “Because this is such an important and public matter that was decided by the former deputy chief justice, it will have persuasive value to those who are deciding other cases.”

The Life Esidimeni tragedy is also likely to end up in the criminal court. Two parallel criminal investigat­ions — one by the South African Police Service and another by the Special Investigat­ing Unit — have been opened.

Pindi Louw from the National Prosecutin­g Authority’s Gauteng office confirmed that the office had received 140 inquest dockets from the police for a decision on whether to prosecute.

Mahlangu, Selebano and the director of mental health services at the time of the Life Esidimeni patient transfers, Makgoba Manamela, could all potentiall­y be implicated in charges including murder, attempted murder, culpable homicide, perjury and corruption.

“Deputy director of public prosecutio­ns George Baloyi has assigned a team of prosecutor­s to work on those documents. They will take between four to six weeks ... and will then announce their decision,” Louw said.

Moseneke labelled Mahlangu’s and Selebano’s testimonie­s during the arbitratio­n hearings as “fabricated and patently false”. “All we can hope for is that, one day, the true reason for the conception and implementa­tion of the Marathon Mental Health Project [of which the Life Esidimeni patient transfers formed part] will see the light of day,” he said.

The spokespers­on for the Life Esidimeni families, Christine Nxumalo, said, although they accepted the compensati­on, they still wanted the department to be held accountabl­e. “We see Qedani Mahlangu and her officials as proper traitors, because they didn’t provide us with the answers we asked for in the hearings,” she said.

“You don’t just forgive a traitor. We want to see that justice is done.”

 ??  ?? Historic ruling: Retired judge Dikgang Moseneke said that he hoped the families of affected mental health users, who were not part of the Life Esidimeni arbitratio­n, would come forward and claim the compensati­on they were due. Photo Delwyn Verasamy
Historic ruling: Retired judge Dikgang Moseneke said that he hoped the families of affected mental health users, who were not part of the Life Esidimeni arbitratio­n, would come forward and claim the compensati­on they were due. Photo Delwyn Verasamy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa