Mail & Guardian

Shout and burn down the fences

-

Iam responding to Milisuthan­do Bongela’s article “Some histories to keep our interracia­l friendship honest” (Friday, March 16). I acknowledg­e the biases of my “female whiteness” and that it will take an entire lifetime of knowledge to deconstruc­t my perception­s of the world.

What I find troubling is your failure to recognise you are engaging in the same colonial discourses that encourage segregatio­n propagated by those “acerbic-natured disciplina­rians and high-voiced disciples, devoted to shouting”. I am very familiar with those relics of colonialis­m: it extended well beyond racial lines and blasted anything nonconform­ist or “other”.

The favourite tactic is to keep a line between “us” and “them”. We are forbidden to cross into the world of the other and the African was always the other. Now, according to your article, I have become the other. This is perfectly acceptable but it does have implicatio­ns. I believe you are falling into a trap I have spent my entire life trying to escape.

You left white friends because they failed to understand you as “complex African person” and the responsibi­lity was left at their feet.

How is this different from colonial attitudes that endorse separate fields of existence? The other cannot understand a different form of cultural identity and so must remain isolated in their ignorance.

The whiteness you describe as stable and unmoving can no longer exist. The colonial protective bubble is a historical construct that is being demolished.

Whiteness is forced to re-examine itself as it is exposed to the truly hybrid nature of humanity. You underestim­ate the powerful forces of democratis­ation.

Does this mean white racial prejudice does not exist? No. But racial discrimina­tion is no longer the dominant discourse in white ideologica­l concepts of existence, and the white woman in your article is more than capable of challengin­g them.

We are no longer passive recipients of historical ideologies.

The only way to truly fight colonialis­t ideologica­l discourses is through dialogue across cultural difference, and not by maintainin­g the status quo of separatism and otherness.

Any race or culture is capable of adapting or falling for the seductive discourses of otherness and natural difference. I know you do not encourage an ideology of separatism, because you hope that we can one day reach “a plane where light can reach”. But there is still the fence of the “historical­ly imbalanced power dynamic”, which will remain as long as everyone still fears it — as colonialis­m intended.

History and democratic revolution have ripped wide holes in that fence, and now its remnants must be torn down. We challenge it daily by interactin­g across racial divides and by promoting friendship­s across cultures.

Shout at the white woman as you would your African friend.

As long as you remain silent, she will not understand. Shout at her boldly and loudly, and she must hear. You will notice how quickly the fences burn. —

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa