Mail & Guardian

Mkhwebane, Cele in a standoff

The public protector has clashed with the police minister over providing witnesses with protection

- Paddy Harper

Public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane has roasted Police Minister Bheki Cele for failing to provide police protection to two whistleblo­wers in “grave danger” of assassinat­ion.

A determinat­ion was made by the police and the State Security Agency that Thabiso Zulu and Les Stuta required protection.

Mkhwebane wants President Cyril Ramaphosa to “reprimand” Cele for his “gross negligence” and “lapse in judgment”.

She has also instructed national police commission­er Khehla Sitole to provide the two, who were witnesses in her investigat­ion into alleged corruption totalling R37-million in the renovation of the Umzimkhulu Memorial Hall, with protection.

But Cele has decided to take Mkhwebane’s report on review and will not provide the two with protection until the review process is concluded.

The report — titled Undue Delay, Improper Conduct: Gross negligence and maladminis­tration by the minister of police and the South African Police Service in failing to provide whistleblo­wers with security at state expense after it was recommende­d that they needed protection — was sent to Cele and Sitole last week.

In the report, Mkhwebane said she had decided to investigat­e the claims of corruption at Umzimkhulu after the public allegation­s by Zulu and Stuta in the media and at the memo- rial service and funeral of murdered ANC councillor Sindiso Magaqa. The two had claimed Magaqa and Umzimkhulu speaker Khaya Thobela were murdered for trying to expose the corruption.

She met Zulu and Stuta in September and they had asked for assistance in securing police protection because they feared for their lives. She had taken the matter up with the relevant authoritie­s.

This led to the decision to investigat­e whether the failure to provide the two with protection was an act of negligence or maladminis­tration and whether there had been an undue delay on the part of Cele or the police. Mkhwebane said Stuta and Zulu were “living in fear for their lives” and the failure by Cele and the police to act “exposes them to a risk of being assassinat­ed”.

She said it also exposed the police and government to legal claims and financial losses should the two men be killed and their families choose to take legal action against the state.

Mkhwebane said an assessment by the State Security Agency found that Stuta and Zulu’s lives were under threat and that protection should be provided to them at state expense.

She said the conduct of Cele and police management in responding to her request was “grossly negligent” and a “slap in the face to the very people that the SAPS [South African Police Service] are employed to protect”. Their conduct could also have “led to unnecessar­y loss of lives”.

In her remedial action, Mkhwebane said Ramaphosa should not only reprimand Cele but also take steps to ensure that similar incidents of “lack of insight or non-action” on the part of members of the executive did not occur in future.

Mkhwebane instructed Cele to give her a copy of the threat assessment within three days, which he had thus far refused to hand over.

She gave him seven days to ensure that the recommenda­tions that the two men be provided with “requisite security at state expense” were implemente­d.

Cele was also given seven days to issue a written apology to Zulu and Stuta and an explanatio­n of why the recommenda­tions were not implemente­d.

Mkhwebane instructed Sitole to ensure that the police adopted a standard operating procedure on how to deal with requests for threat assessment­s and that instructio­ns from the police ministers were carried out without delay. On Wednesday, Zulu, whose lawyers have served the police with notice of a high court applicatio­n to force them to protect him, said he had still not been given protection.

“It appears I am left with no course but to proceed with legal action,” he said.

Cele’s spokespers­on, Reneilwe Serero, said he had “perused” the report and had “serious reservatio­ns” about its findings and the proposed remedial actions.

She said Cele had instructed police management to take the report on judicial review “because of its dire consequenc­es” for the ministry and the police if left unchalleng­ed.

None of the remedial actions would be implemente­d until the review was concluded, she said.

Public protector spokespers­on Oupa Segalwe had not responded to queries by the time of publicatio­n.

 ??  ?? At risk: Two whistle-blowers, who claimed that ANC councillor Sindiso Magaqa had been murdered for trying to expose corruption, do not have police protection. Photo: Thuli Dlamini/Sunday Times/Gallo Images
At risk: Two whistle-blowers, who claimed that ANC councillor Sindiso Magaqa had been murdered for trying to expose corruption, do not have police protection. Photo: Thuli Dlamini/Sunday Times/Gallo Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa