Mail & Guardian

Jagersfont­ein class action lawsuit imminent

Three people were killed and dozens injured a year ago when the tailings dam at the Jagersfont­ein diamond mine collapsed

- Sheree Bega

Alittle over a year ago, in the early hours of 11 September, the tailings dam at the Jagersfont­ein diamond mine collapsed, releasing a torrent of thick grey sludge that engulfed the Free State town.

Three people were killed, dozens were injured, and more than 160 homes were destroyed or damaged by the deluge, which inundated rivers and farmland.

Richard Spoor, whose public interest law firm, Richard Spoor Inc Attorneys, is representi­ng families affected by the disaster, said he hoped to file its applicatio­n for a class action suit against Jagersfont­ein Developmen­ts, which owns the diamond tailings reprocessi­ng facility, within the next few weeks.

“The idea is a class action. Step one is certificat­ion — it’s a slam dunk. I mean the common issues are: is Jagersfont­ein Developmen­ts responsibl­e for this collapse, and the injuries and the harm that followed?”

There are two grounds on which the company could be held liable. “One is strict liability in terms of the National Water Act, or the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Developmen­t Act, or the National Environmen­tal Management Act.”

All of those laws hold people liable for environmen­tal pollution and contaminat­ion and the consequenc­es, Spoor said. But there is another option “if they say well, environmen­tal harm and pollution doesn’t include the destructio­n of people’s personal property and possession­s”.

“We have a back-up claim for negligence so we will have experts who are willing to testify that this dam was a catastroph­e; they were reckless and negligent.”

Jagersfont­ein Developmen­ts did not respond to the Mail & Guardian’s inquiries.

Spoor said the company had concluded about 36 agreements with people whose homes were destroyed and damaged “in terms of which they agreed to replace the homes but in return for a way of ending any claims against the mine”.

He slammed this as “oppressive and unlawful”.

“Residents don’t really have a choice but to conclude these agreements because they’re homeless … I mean, these people destroyed their homes and now you’ve got to beg and plead and accept the replacemen­t of the homes on terms that they dictate to you,” he said. “It’s shocking and it’s because … the state hasn’t done anything to ensure they are compensate­d, that they don’t need to rely on the mercy of the mine.”

Spoor said his law firm’s laboratory analysis of the metals deposited in soil, sludge and sediment has shown that the kimberlite tailings contain a plethora of salts and toxins, including significan­t quantities of lead, arsenic, barium, thallium, nickel and hexavalent chromium.

Hexavalent chromium is toxic and carcinogen­ic and is “very nasty Erin Brockovich stuff”, he said. Meanwhile, laboratory analysis is being conducted for asbestos, which is commonly associated with kimberlite.

“We’ve done two studies of the tailings — one a kind of a size analysis, a particle size analysis — to get an idea of the size of the particles in the slurry, and what we find is a very significan­t proportion of the tailings are smaller than seven nanometres, very, very fine, which means two things,” Spoor said.

“One, it’s respirable when it’s dry and raised into the air and it can be raised into the air very readily because it’s so small, and respirable means it enters the lungs, it’s not trapped in the upper airways ... This goes into your lungs — it’s respirable dust.”

The other implicatio­n of the fineness of this material is that it can’t be filtered out of water. “You can remove it with flocculant­s. But you can’t filter it. Assuming this stuff is bad for people, or animals, or crops, you need it to run through a proper water treatment plant to make it safe and usable, you can’t just filter it. It makes it difficult to clean this up.”

Spoor said although there is a popular perception that because kimberlite tailings are alkaline — they are actually highly caustic — it’s not as big a problem as acid mine tailings, which mobilise metals and release them into the water.

“But the advice we’re getting from experts is that that is not necessaril­y the case at all … The rain is slightly acid and the continual interactio­n between this alkaline material and the acid rain is going to release this stuff over a very, very long time.

“I think, most importantl­y, we don’t know that this environmen­t is safe for them to rebuild houses or for people to live [there] … but it’s not our job to come up with those answers,” Spoor said. “The authoritie­s need to satisfy themselves that it is safe and I’m not sure that they’ve done that.”

The department of forestry, fisheries and the environmen­t has issued one directive against Jagersfont­ein Developmen­ts, which requires it to undertake a human health risk assessment, which “will make a definitive finding on the overall toxicity of the material which entered the environmen­t”, spokespers­on Peter Mbelengwa said.

An October tailings analysis report by the University of the Free State detailed how there are low concentrat­ions of uranium and arsenic in the collected samples of the tailings and the soil beneath it.

“The tailings material does contain elevated concentrat­ions of nickel, chrome and barium. These elements are contained in the minerals of the kimberlite geology, the rocks from which diamonds are extracted.

“The mineralogi­cal analysis indicates that a large proportion — that is, more than 30% weight of the tailings material — consists of clay materials.”

These minerals have the capacity to immobilise metals. “Thereafter, even though the tailings material does contain elevated concentrat­ions of some metals, the probabilit­y of them being released into the natural environmen­t is negligible. The mineralogi­cal and total chemical results thus indicate that the tailings material is not toxic and does not pose a chemical toxicity risk for humans or the environmen­t,” the report noted.

Wisane Mavasa, spokespers­on for the department of water and sanitation, said it had issued a directive to Jagersfont­ein Developmen­ts, instructin­g the company to rehabilita­te and restore the watercours­es that were affected by the slimes because of the dam failure. These include the Wolwas Dam, Kromellenb­oog River, Proses Spruit, Riet River and the Kalkfontei­n Dam.

In November, it opened a criminal case against the company under the National Water Act and would now issue a warning statement to the alleged transgress­or before the file is handed to the National Prosecutio­n Authority.

The department issued numerous directives to Jagersfont­ein Developmen­t and instructed the mine to appoint an approved profession­al person to oversee the immediate emptying of the remaining compartmen­t two of the tailings storage facility, “which still contains a significan­t volume of tailings, to avoid a secondary disaster from occurring”.

This person will assist the company in the decommissi­oning of the entire tailings dam. “The process of decanting this compartmen­t two, which started in August 2023, is under way. Until this decanting process has been completed, the tailings dam is still regarded as unsafe”.

Mavasa said the department has appointed the universiti­es of Pretoria and the Witwatersr­and to investigat­e the causes of the failure “to assist the department to ensure that similar occurrence­s are prevented in future, and to improve its regulation of tailing dam safety”. This complex investigat­ion is expected to be concluded by the end of March.

The physical footprint of the spillage covers an area of about 65km, which affected a range of ecological systems, Mbelengwa said.

The clean-up and rehabilita­tion is based on the instructio­ns contained in the forestry, fisheries and the environmen­t department directive as well as the directives issued by the Free State department of economic, small business developmen­t, tourism and environmen­tal affairs and the water and sanitation department.

The three-tier approach was implemente­d within a week of the disaster and the various specialist­s were appointed by Jagersfont­ein Developmen­ts, he said. Mbelengwa confirmed that Piet-louis Grundling, a wetland rehabilita­tion specialist at the environmen­t department, was asked by the Free State department to coordinate an intergover­nmental team to direct the environmen­tal rehabilita­tion.

It is estimated that large tracts of the affected area between the failed tailings dam and the Wolwas Dam have been cleared (about 40%), where the deposition of the material is thicker than 10cm.

Hexavalent chromium is toxic and carcinogen­ic and is ‘very nasty Erin Brockovich stuff’

 ?? ??
 ?? Photos: Mlungisi Louw/gallo Images ?? Aftermath: Sello Tshalau (above) looks at the damage caused when the Jagersfont­ein mine dam burst a year ago (below). About 160 houses were destroyed, people killed and injured and extensive downstream environmen­tal damage caused. The sludge also contains toxic materials.
Photos: Mlungisi Louw/gallo Images Aftermath: Sello Tshalau (above) looks at the damage caused when the Jagersfont­ein mine dam burst a year ago (below). About 160 houses were destroyed, people killed and injured and extensive downstream environmen­tal damage caused. The sludge also contains toxic materials.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa