Mail & Guardian

Resource plan sends wrong signals

South Africa’s draft energy plan scales back renewable projects seen as key source of growth

- ANALYSIS Sarah Smit

After numerous delays, the highly anticipate­d revised Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) has landed with a

thud.

Notwithsta­nding some of its more controvers­ial aspects, such as the paring back of renewables and the fact that it sees load-shedding continuing for at least another three years, the draft energy blueprint was slated for being thin on detail — leaving investors with more questions than answers.

On first read, the draft IRP 2023 seems contradict­ory insofar as the role it envisions the private sector will play in the country’s energy future, Business Unity South Africa’s environmen­tal and energy manager, Happy Khambule, said earlier this week.

On the one hand, the plan acknowledg­es the large part of the sector in an energy market that has become more deregulate­d than ever. “But in terms of the primary technologi­es which we are meant to be rallying, which is wind and solar, the renewables, it then undermines the potential there,” Khambule said.

The reduction in renewable procuremen­t, compared to the 2019 iteration of the IRP, has been a key feature of the criticism against the updated plan.

The IRP 2019 envisioned the installati­on of 15.2 gigawatts of wind and solar photovolta­ic (PV) on the grid from 2024 to 2030. In the draft plan, this number falls to just eight gigawatts — which is in stark contrast to a recommenda­tion by the Presidenti­al Climate Commission that the adjusted IRP promote 50 to 60 gigawatts of variable renewable energy by 2030.

Commentato­rs have picked up on mixed messages elsewhere, most notably that the draft IRP sees loadsheddi­ng continuing until 2027 — an outcome that would further hamstring the country’s limping economy. The National Energy Crisis

Committee (Necom), also establishe­d by the president, sees loadsheddi­ng ending two years earlier based on the successful implementa­tion of the energy action plan.

Necom’s stated priorities include making it easier for the private sector to invest in new energy sources and to fast-track new generation capacity from wind, solar, gas and battery storage.

“There isn’t a consistent message between the department, the rest of government and its initiative­s on when load-shedding is going to be reduced to a manageable rate and when it is going to end,” Khambule said.

“I think it sends the wrong message. It’s really about the message that comes from the different quarters of government. If government is saying there is still going to be loadsheddi­ng until 2027, that should be consistent across the board. We can’t have the electricit­y minister saying one thing, Necom indicating something else, the president saying something else and the department’s planning document saying something totally different.”

This week, Electricit­y Minister Kgosientsh­o Ramokgopa sought to clear up confusion — noting that although the draft IRP may contain a less optimistic view, work is being done to bring load-shedding to heel earlier.

Addressing questions about the smaller renewables allocation, the director general of the department of mineral resources and energy, Jacob Mbele, said this is a result of the lower electricit­y demand projection­s used to formulate the draft IRP.

“The amount of renewables is a function of the demand you are trying to meet. So if demand is down, obviously the quantum will be less,” he said. “And that is not just for renewables. The overall system requiremen­ts or potential generation will be less than what you had before.”

Mbele also attributed the smaller renewables allocation to the fact that more households and businesses are investing in rooftop solar,

the delayed decommissi­oning of Eskom’s coal-fired plants and a significan­t expansion of gas projects.

Responding to the flood of criticism surroundin­g the draft IRP’S vision for wind and solar, energy economist Lungile Mashele noted that state-led renewable procuremen­t has been replete with issues, with many of the approved projects taking years to reach financial close.

Moreover, South Africa’s transmissi­on problems — which need to be fixed to install more renewable capacity — won’t be resolved by 2030, according to Mashele.

Importantl­y, the scaled-down approach to wind and solar does not bode well for the South African Renewable Energy Master Plan (Sarem), devised through a joint effort between the mineral resources and energy, trade and industry and science and technology department­s.

Aimed at driving industrial developmen­t through renewable energy

projects, the master plan emphasises the importance of anchoring demand for these investment­s through public procuremen­t.

Gaylor Montmasson-clair, a senior economist at Trade & Industrial Policy Strategies and Sarem facilitato­r, said it is critical that the government’s efforts to bring about energy security and grow the economy be in alignment.

The government’s industrial developmen­t ambitions arguably fall outside the scope of the IRP, Montmasson-clair said, adding: “But having said that, it can certainly send signals. And it is necessary to send those signals in terms of where the policy mix is going.

“And so, it’s quite clear that there is as we stand misalignme­nts between what is put forward in the IRP and what we need as a country to achieve our ambitions around the industrial developmen­t of the renewable energy value chain.”

Montmasson-clair noted that energy security, at the lowest cost, must take precedence in the IRP. The position of a number of experts is that a renewable-heavy energy mix can achieve these goals.

“So we certainly would expect quite a big ambition when it comes to the roll-out of renewable energy, particular­ly solar PV and wind, as well as battery storage. Because they are affordable. They can be rolled out quickly … And we know that the bonus, as we know from the work we have done at Sarem, we have opportunit­ies on the industrial developmen­t side that could materialis­e if we are serious about the signal that we send.”

The master plan emphasises the need to break away from the stopstart pattern of public procuremen­t, Montmasson-clair noted. “If you want to grow manufactur­ing, you have to move away from stop-start,” Montmasson-clair said. But the draft IRP seems to entrench this trend.

The document also concedes that the government’s renewable procuremen­t programme has been undermined by a series of problems.

“The programme was stalled between 2015 and 2019 due to institutio­nal issues and the implementa­tion of procuremen­t rounds has been haphazard since then,” the master plan notes. According to the document, local content rules, transmissi­on constraint­s and delays and changes to the procuremen­t framework have undermined policy certainty — knocking market confidence.

Montmasson-clair said the country’s flawed renewable procuremen­t programme needs to be re-thought. “But that doesn’t take away the fact that public procuremen­t is tremendous­ly important. We need that procuremen­t for the industry to grow.”

Recent history has proven that sound public spending, as well as policy certainty, are vital to fulfilling the private sector’s ambitions. Meanwhile, a number of analysts have pointed to renewable investment­s as being among the few sources of economic growth.

Stakeholde­rs will have to come to grips with the nitty-gritty of the draft IRP 2023 in the coming months, as they dig into the data underlying the assumption­s made in the document.

The mineral resources and energy department has set a 23 February deadline for written comments on the draft, which will also be the subject of discussion­s at the National Economic Developmen­t and Labour Council. The department hopes to wrap up the reviewing process by 31 May 2024, a deadline which would leave little time for stakeholde­rs to find one another.

The approach to wind and solar does not bode well for the South African Renewable Energy Master Plan

‘We need a revised Integrated Resource Plan ASAP … The scary part, by the way, is that every day that goes by without us finalising the IRP, the assumption­s get outdated.’ — Jacob Mbele, director general of the department of mineral resources and energy

 ?? ??
 ?? Photos: Getty Images ?? Contradict­ion: Investors need the government’s stop-start procuremen­t of renewable energy such as wind and solar to end but the draft IRP embeds this trend.
Photos: Getty Images Contradict­ion: Investors need the government’s stop-start procuremen­t of renewable energy such as wind and solar to end but the draft IRP embeds this trend.
 ?? ?? Misaligned: Business Unity South Africa’s Happy Khambule says the 2023 draft IRP undermines the potential for renewable energy.
Misaligned: Business Unity South Africa’s Happy Khambule says the 2023 draft IRP undermines the potential for renewable energy.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa