Post

KZN capital in a shambles

-

ACCORDING to news reports, measures have been taken under Section 139 (1)b to place the uMsunduzi Municipali­ty under administra­tion.

This is the second time in 10 years that the municipali­ty will be placed under administra­tion due to gross mismanagem­ent of resources.

The extreme deteriorat­ion and neglect of the city should have served notice to the ruling party and councillor­s that something is “rotten in the capital city of KwaZulu-Natal”.

The potholes, dysfunctio­nal street lights, lack of visible traffic policing, water leaks in numerous parts of the city, garbage lying around all over the city, blocked manholes, roads and pavements in a state of disrepair, to name but a few, ought to have been the wake-up call to the councillor­s that Msunduzi is heading towards becoming a dysfunctio­nal city.

Residents pay high rates, taxes and electricit­y diligently and therefore expect to receive these services from the council.

But sadly, the service delivery level from the council is sickening.

According to the Company’s Act and the King’s report on Corporate Governance for South Africa, a breach of duties as a company director can hold serious consequenc­es for a director.

Hence, I believe municipali­ties should be run according to the Companies Act, so in the event of negligence, malpractic­e, and mismanagem­ent, councillor­s could also be held responsibl­e for lack of service delivery, neglect of the city and mismanagem­ent of finances.

It is time that political parties, Members of Parliament, and councillor­s be held accountabl­e like company directors.

There should be consequenc­es and accountabi­lity for the mess that the city is faced with.

MOHAMED SAEED Pietermari­tzburg

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa