Post

Concerns over Ladysmith renaming

- LATOYA NEWMAN latoya.newman@inl.co.za

A PROPOSED name change for Ladysmith to uMnambithi, has been met with mixed reaction by the community.

The KwaZulu-Natal Department of Sport, Arts and Culture (KZN DSAC), together with the KZN Geographic­al Names Committee, invited residents to comment on the proposed name change at meetings held from November 27 to December 1.

The town is currently known as both Ladysmith and Mnambithi.

Nathi Olifant, KZN DSAC spokespers­on, said: “Ladysmith’s name has not been changed, but the decision to propose the name change was initiated by the residents around the Alfred Duma Local Municipali­ty. The outcome of the vote cannot be disclosed. Thousands of people participat­ed in the process.

“Consultati­on exercises had been conducted extensivel­y with residents, local and district municipali­ties, amakhosi, religious leaders, old age homes and political leadership, to name just a few. The results will be first presented to the MEC by the KZN Provincial Geographic Names Committee before it is referred to the minister to gazette it after further consultati­on.”

According to Britannica.com, Ladysmith was founded in 1850 after the British annexed the area. It was named after the wife of Harry Smith (then governor of Cape Colony).

According to Wikipedia, on August 3, 2016, Ladysmith was merged into the larger Alfred Duma Local Municipali­ty. Important industries in the area include food processing, textiles and tyre production. The town of Ladysmith is the economic hub of the municipali­ty.

The POST spoke with some residents and community representa­tives who largely expressed reservatio­ns about the possible renaming.

Anand Rajcoomar, councillor for ward 11, said: “The community feedback on our WhatsApp groups was largely dissatisfi­ed that money may be spent on an unimportan­t matter, at this point.

“It is not a trivial issue, but does it have to be done now? We have service delivery challenges. The government is always saying there are no funds, but it is willing to spend millions of rand on a name change.

“Ladysmith is also steeped in history and known worldwide for its historical sites linked to the Boer, Afrikaner, English and Zulu history. It can prove its historical value to the country.

“uMnambithi is the name of a river. It is a fair and a universal name. But if a name change is necessary, it should be done at a time when it is more financiall­y viable to do so. With all that said, the vote was open and fair judging from the meetings I attended. We had the chance to voice our opinions,” said Rajcoomar.

Jennifer Wallace, spokespers­on for the Northern KZN Chamber of Commerce, said: “The proposed timing for Ladysmith’s name change is worrying. Business confidence is at an all-time low, with companies facing financial losses and anticipati­ng job cuts. Service delivery is inconsiste­nt, leaving residents and factories without water.

“Instead of investing in name changes, shouldn’t the government department­s collaborat­e across levels to address these urgent issues and rebuild confidence? Let’s prioritise solving these problems before considerin­g name changes. Additional­ly, the government overlooks the unplanned costs these name changes impose on businesses.”

Ian Thurlow, a resident and former chairperso­n of the Ladysmith Residents Associatio­n, said by changing the name of Ladysmith, the town would lose its identity.

“The Siege of Ladysmith has huge historical connection­s. So certainly from that perspectiv­e, it is a waste to change the name. Our understand­ing is that if residents are unhappy after the results are released, they can make submission­s and take it from there. But I think the general feeling is that government has already made up its mind.”

Olifant said there were other names proposed, but these did not qualify in terms of the South African Geographic­al Names Council Act, 1998 (Act 118 of 1998).

The names that did not qualify included “Yithi Abafana Basemnambi­thi” (Say the Boys of Mnambithi) and “Ladysmith Black Mambazo”.

The POST asked Olifant what the related cost of a name change would be. He referred the publicatio­n to the national DSAC.

Zimasa Velaphi, spokespers­on for the national DSAC, said: “The Department of Sport, Arts and Culture, the SA Geographic­al Names Council (SAGNC), and the minister have not processed an applicatio­n for the name change of Ladysmith. It is possible that an applicatio­n is still being processed at the local level.

“Name change applicatio­ns do not cost money apart from honoraria paid to members of the SA Geographic­al Names Council and a small fee for the publishing of government gazettes.”

A statement on December 8, on the national department’s website, said the SAGNC mandate was to lead the transforma­tion of South Africa’s naming landscape.

“Many names of our villages, towns and cities still reflect the languages and cultural heritage of the colonial and apartheid administra­tions. One hundred and fifty-seven geographic­al names have been standardis­ed throughout the country for the past three years.”

Some of the most recent name changes include Solomon Linda (Pomeroy, KZN), Gqeberha (Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape), King Phalo Airport (East London Airport, Eastern Cape) and KwaNojoli (Somerset East, Eastern Cape).

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa