Epic break-up of Hollywood’s powerhouse brand
The Jolie-Pitt fairy-tale family comes unstuck
IT’S HARD now to remember a time before Brangelina, or to even think of them as they were then, circa 2004. He was already a pretty big deal, and so was she: two solid A-listers occupying equal but separate swaths of the celebrity stratosphere.
Then Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie got together, and something happened. The tabloids lost their minds, obviously – and they each, magically, became bigger, better, more elevated versions of their famous-person selves.
Pitt, who had coasted through so many films on his pretty-boy charm, became a for midable producer, lauded for his mature, nuanced acting chops. Jolie, an exotic beauty notorious for her wild-child antics and lucrative action flicks, evolved into one of the world’s most respected advocates for humanitarian causes, a tireless visitor to refugee camps and the Council on Foreign Relations.
Katharine Hepburn once explained the on-screen chemistry of Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers like this: “He gives her class and she gives him sex appeal.” It’s hard to say exactly what it was that Pitt and Jolie gave each other to create this magical, image-changing gravitas… except, hmmm. Maybe the six kids? Who else in Hollywood has that?
When it was announced on Tuesday that Jolie had filed for divorce from Pitt, the mind first went to that gorgeous, multi-ethnic brood. “What mat- ters most now is the well-being of our kids,” Pitt said in the statement, which echoed so many other celebrity divorce announcements – a sort of ordinary ending to a relationship that had seemed anything but.
It didn’t start well, by traditional PR standards. Pitt was married when he met Jolie on the set of the 2005 romantic thriller Mr and Mrs Smith. They denied the whispers, which grew only louder when he split from wholesome sitcom star Jennifer Aniston. Months followed of more denials and awkward distances kept on red carpets. The word “homewrecker” was thrown around a lot. The optics weren’t great.
In hindsight, the savvy, gradual roll-out of their relationship seems like the start of greater image makeovers to come. They were photographed together on a beach in Kenya, but paparazzi images of the new couple were anything but salacious: They were playing with her young son, Maddox, whom she had adopted from Cambodia in 2002.
When she adopted daughter Zahara from Ethiopia months later, it was made public that Pitt had accompanied her. Before they even acknowledged their affair, they were already seen as a family.
And then, the Jolie-Pitts were off and running. In 2006, she gave birth to their daughter Shiloh. Then they adopted Pax from Vietnam. Then they had the twins, Knox and Vivienne. When they finally got around to marriage, in 2014, it seemed like an afterthought. They said they did it for the kids.
Children tend to complicate one’s career. But in the case of Pitt and Jolie, a growing family seemed to go hand-inhand with their interest in philanthropic and advocacy work, and with their evolving screen roles.
Jolie’s vixen persona was quickly supplanted by an earth-mother image. She travelled to Darfur and Kabul to call attention to the plight of people displaced by conflict; she created a wildlife reserve in Cambodia; she funded a girls’ school in Kenya; and she lectured at the London School of Economics.
She continued to cash big cheques for blockbusters such as Salt and Wanted, but she also moved into directing – a small, independent film about the war in Sarajevo, followed by a big prestige flick, the World War II drama Unbroken.
Jolie largely drew a curtain around her private life but went public with her cancer scare in a pair of New York Time.
Pitt, too, became something like the best version of himself. Behind the scenes, he produced Oscar winners The Departed and 12 Years a Slave, as well as such socially relevant contenders as Selma, The Big Short and others.