Saturday Star

How could you raise a ‘no-nappy’ baby?

-

health problems in infants such as diaper rash, urinary tract infections and even dangerous methicilli­n-resistant Staphyloco­ccus aureus (MRSA) infections, Bender and She said.

“It’s funny that we think of it as modern and new, where it’s probably a very old and ancient practice, and what people did before there were nappies and still do across the world where they don’t have the luxury of disposable nappies,” said She, a pathologis­t and medical microbiolo­gist at Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California.

“I wanted to share our story in hopes other people would be interested in it as well, and maybe spark some research,” said Bender, a pediatric infectious diseases spe- cialist at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.

He noted that their daughter – now five – learnt the ropes of EC within a couple of months of birth, with only a few “accidents”.

Disposable nappies might take more than 500 years to degrade. And it’s estimated that more than 27 billion disposable nappies are used in the US each year, according to the study.

Bender and She were among the majority of American parents who used disposable nappies with their two sons.

But after reading about EC, they decided to change their approach with their third child.

During her first weeks of life, they clad her in cloth nappies but regularly attempted “toilet time” after each feed and nap.

Holding her over the toilet, they also whistled two notes that their daughter would come to associate with naturally relieving herself.

By the end of her first month, the parents experience­d only one or two “misses” a day.

“The first time we got her to go poop in the toilet after eating and didn’t have to clean a nappy, that was like the best thing ever,” Bender said.

“By about six months or so, we could go out with her and carry maybe a change of clothes, but rarely had to use them. I can’t believe we ever (used) nappies.”

When their parental leave finished, the couple’s nanny continued their efforts.

Their caregiver’s Taiwanese grandmothe­r had used EC with her when she was an infant, coincident­ally.

But Bender and She acknowledg­e that carrying out the method with a child who goes to daycare could be problemati­c. Multiple caregivers and children in a larger setting pose obstacles to paying close attention to one infant’s particular cues and responding in time, they said.

A one-time babysitter would also have trouble quickly adapting.

“The way our society is, with a lot of children in daycare, this probably isn’t feasible,” Bender said.

“By no means do we feel this is for everyone. We were fortunate and in a pos- ition to take alternate months off (when our daughter was a newborn), and a lot of parents don’t have that luxury.”

Paediatric­ian Dr Rashidah Green hasn’t yet encountere­d parents who used EC with their infants. She noted the challenge working parents would face trying to incorporat­e EC into their day-to-day lives.

“A lot of my patients have parents who are very busy – a lot of parents are both working, and sometimes come from a single-parent home. So, I don’t think it’s the easiest thing to do for kids,” said Green, from Montefiore Medical Group in New York City.

“I definitely agree with what (She and Bender) mentioned in the paper about reducing landfill waste – that’s a huge pro,” she added.

“A lot of my patients come in with nappy rashes, so I think reducing rates of nappy rash is also a pro.”

The study was published online on Wednesday in the journal Pediatrics. – The New York Times

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa