Pregnancy will give Serena the edge
Tennis great tips her to stay tops
Melbourne – Motherhood may do little to slow Serena Williams’s pursuit of Grand Slam success but more hungry opponents, if they emerge, could yet deny her the all-time singles record, the women who holds that distinction told Reuters.
Australian great Margaret Court won 24 Grand Slam singles titles, one ahead of American Williams, who confirmed she was pregnant on Wednesday and will sit out the rest of the season.
Court, 74, who straddled the sport’s amateur and professional eras, was also the first mother to win a major as a professional.
She took three of those titles in 1973, the year after giving birth to her first child Daniel.
But she rejoined the tour at 31 while Williams would be 36 if she came back as planned in 2018, a difference Court thought might play a role.
“Coming back after Daniel I had one of my best years ... [but] I was quite a few years younger [than Serena],” Court said yesterday.
“And I think you’ve got to know physically what you can do and how you can do it. You put the baby first and that to me was everything at the time. But we’re all different.”
The only other mothers to win slams in the Open era are Court’s compatriot Evonne Goolagong and Belgian Kim Clijsters, who were both 26 when they came back.
“I don’t know [if Serena can win another] ... It will depend whether she still feels like doing it. It’ll depend on her,” Court said.
Williams’s “20 weeks” caption in a social media post on Wednesday suggested she was two months’ pregnant when she won her 23rd Grand Slam at this year’s Australian Open.
Court was also well into her term with Daniel when she lost the 1971 Wimbledon final to Goolagong. But she had no idea.
“Our first child was with me on the centre court. My coordination, my timing was all out and I thought: ‘what’s wrong with me?’
“Balls were dropping in and I was letting them go. Nobody knew. I went to the doctor and then I found out,” she said.
Marketing experts have said Williams’s pregnancy will boost her commercial appeal and open up lucrative avenues into maternal-wear and baby clothes. Court said such commercial spinoffs did not exist in her day.