Sowetan

Final impeachmen­t rules by end-March

All parties to receive draft proposals for discussion

- By Linda Ensor

A sub-committee of parliament’s rules committee is hoping to finalise parliament­ary rules for the impeachmen­t of President Jacob Zuma‚ including their adoption by the House of Assembly‚ by the end of March.

The sub-committee met yesterday to take forward the process begun several years ago to formulate impeachmen­t process rules. It was prompted into action by a ruling of the Constituti­onal Court that it do this without delay.

The court handed down judgment last month in a case brought by the EFF‚ the United Democratic Movement and the Congress of the People.

The three opposition parties asked for an order declaring that the National Assembly had failed to put in place mechanisms and processes to hold the president accountabl­e for failing to implement the remedial action ordered by former public protector Thuli Madonsela in relation to the misuse of state resources on the upgrade of his Nkandla residence.

The parties also sought an order compelling the National Assembly to convene a committee to investigat­e whether the president was guilty of any impeachabl­e conduct under section 89 of the constituti­on.

Yesterday, the sub-committee‚ chaired by Richard Mdakane‚ decided at the end of its deliberati­ons to distribute draft proposals to the different parties for considerat­ion and to meet again later.

One of the main issues discussed was how to prevent the factual inquiry being subverted by majoritari­anism‚ with even ANC MP Mnyamezeli Booi emphasisin­g that mechanisms needed to be put in place for this. In the past‚ the ANC used its majority in the National Assembly and ad hoc committees to protect Zuma from attempts by opposition parties to unseat him.

EFF MP Mbuyiseni Ndlozi recommende­d that a panel of three to five judges be on permanent standby to conduct an impeachmen­t inquiry when necessary‚ but the DA chief whip, John Steenhuise­n, questioned whether parliament could delegate its responsibi­lity to hold the executive to account elsewhere.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa