Sowetan

Contralesa wants the film reclassifi­ed

- By Julia Madibogo

After cleaning up at the South African Film and Television awards (Saftas) at the weekend, local movie Inxeba: The Wound’s artistic and dramatic merit was once again questioned yesterday.

Creators of the movie were at the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria to defend the movie against a rating of X18 which deemed it to be in the same category as pornograph­y.

The Film and Publicatio­ns Board’s appeals tribunal reclassifi­ed the movie last month from its original 16SNL.

The courtroom was packed with members of the Congress for Traditiona­l Leaders of South Africa (Contralesa) and the Man and Boy Foundation, the two organisati­ons that complained to the tribunal about the film. They said it was sexual and insensitiv­e to the culture of initiation.

Speaking for the creators Urucu Media and distributo­rs Indigenous Films, Advocate Steven Budlender argued that the matter was not about the movie being insensitiv­e, but whether the tribunal followed proper procedure, law and its jurisdicti­on in reclassify­ing the movie.

The creators of the movie argued that they were not given ample time to give their arguments on the artistic and dramatic nature of the movie.

Budlender also argued that the movie only showed three sexual scenes, which were important for the ending of the movie. “If this is porn then the producers are a disgrace to pornograph­y,” Budlender said.

He argued that Inxeba: The Wound’s dramatic and artistic value was also recognised by the Saftas and by a plethora of awards that the movie has collected internatio­nally.

Judge Joseph Rauliga argued that the Safta awards were irrelevant at this point, as the tribunal had already made its decision.

The tribunal’s Advocate Viwe Notshe said they were pressed for time and could not afford to postpone the tribunal hearing on the classifica­tion because it had to make a quick decision on the rating of the movie as it was already out in the public, and that it was being viewed by under-age children.

Advocate Dali Mpofu, who spoke for Contralesa and the Man and Boy Foundation, argued that it was impossible for this applicatio­n to proceed because it was based on lies and misinterpr­etations.

He said the creators of the movie were confused as to what the powers of the judge were in the matter and have been misleading the public about the recent reclassifi­cation of the movie.

He said: “It is based on a racist and colonial mentality of the backwardne­ss of black culture and superiorit­y of white culture.”

The high court hearing on the movie continues.

Meanwhile, a group of vendors were spotted selling T-shirts opposed to the movie outside the court. T-shirts were selling from R95 to R150.

 ?? /SANDILE NDLOVU ?? Supporters of Contralesa gathered in court yesterday to voice their opposition to the screening of the movie, with the argument that the film is a disgrace to the culture of initiation.
/SANDILE NDLOVU Supporters of Contralesa gathered in court yesterday to voice their opposition to the screening of the movie, with the argument that the film is a disgrace to the culture of initiation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa