Sowetan

Fund holds on to offspring’s payout

Mineworker­s Provident Fund says it’s working on the matter, nine years on

- Thuli Zungu Tel: (011) 280-3086. E-mail: zungut@sowetan.co.za or write to PO Box 6663, Johannesbu­rg, 2000

Unborn children have rights to inherit from their deceased parents if they were conceived at the time of death and subsequent­ly born alive.

However, the Mineworker­s Provident Fund (MWPF) has questioned the legitimacy of a child fathered by their member who died after the child was conceived and has neglected to pay out the benefits even after the Pension Funds Adjudicato­r has ordered it to pay.

Mpolai Lebeko, 37, of Saaiplaas in Virginia, Free State, has been battling for the past nine years to get her benefit of R436 233 from MWPF.

Lebeko said she was five months pregnant when her customary union husband Tsowe Tshabalala passed away in February 2009.

She said her relatives and prospectiv­e in-laws met to negotiate and paid lobolo.

“Though the families had agreed on the formalitie­s and the date in which I would be handed over to the Tshabalala­s, this did not happen as he died before our child was even born,” Lebeko said.

Her daughter was born in June of that year and she was asked to conduct a paternity test to confirm her child was indeed fathered by the late Tshabalala.

She agreed, but the Tshabalala family did not cooperate yet they had demanded the paternity test, said Lebeko.

The relationsh­ip with her inlaws has since soured, she said.

She has earned a living as a cleaner and by selling bricks from a dilapidate­d mine site in her area, Lebeko said.

“The MWPF also gave me different excuses each time I inquired about my benefits and that drove me to knock at the offices of the Pension Fund Adjudicato­r,” Lebeko said.

She said adjudicato­r Muvhango Lukhaimane said MWPF’s delay in paying out the death benefit was unreasonab­le and unacceptab­le as it should have been paid in February 2010.

Lukhaimane said MWPF grossly failed to finalise the distributi­on of the death benefit within the legislatio­n framework and that it failed to demonstrat­e the steps they took to comply with section 37C of the Pension Funds Act.

“What is evident is that the fund is aware of the deceased and it is sitting idly instead of being proactive,” read her determinat­ion.

She said although she ordered the fund to pay Lebeko her benefit at a rate of 10% per year for the past five year, the fund has just defied the order and not paid her, Lukhaimane said. However, Jan Kgosana from the Mineworker­s Provident Fund, said they were not defying the Pension Funds determinat­ion.

“We are doing our utmost to collate the documents to finalise this case accordingl­y.”

He said in terms of section 37C of the Act they had to ensure that the benefit allocation was equitable.

He said they could only arrive at that “provided that we have all the documents and relevant facts beforehand”.

“Without proper and relevant informatio­n, we are going to overpay or underpay, or even omit some of the beneficiar­ies who are eligible,” Kgosana said.

He said the benefit for this case was not disposed earlier due to further requiremen­ts and that the case had been taken back to the trustees lately.

“We will have the outcome before Friday next week and then we will advise accordingl­y,” Kgosana said.

 ??  ?? A mother whose late husband died while she was pregnant battles to get her daughter’s share from his provident fund.
A mother whose late husband died while she was pregnant battles to get her daughter’s share from his provident fund.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa