Sunday Times

HERE’S TO A BRU WITH SOUL

-

LIKE all characters worth their weight in gold, our hero has been reviled by some and revered by others. He has been blamed for the breakdown of families — but were it not for him, say others, they would not have been able to send their children to school and university.

Some say this chap made the majority of our people into impotent zombies at the mercy of apartheid apparatchi­ks; others say: “Look, were it not for him, the townships as we know them would have long collapsed!”

Meet our hero, Mr Sorghum Mqombothi — quite a likeable chap if you understand him, but also easy to mistake for the poor cousins who pose as him and proceed to do untold damage to those who fall for their tricks.

You and I are made of flesh and bone, of fibre and liquids. We have a soul. Mr Mqombothi, on the other hand, is made of maize, maize malt, sorghum malt, yeast and water. But, hey, he also has a soul — or so say his defenders.

Mr Mqombothi is a resilient relic of an ancient civilisati­on that has been buffeted by winds ranging from religious zealotry to political manipulati­on — and survived.

But why the sudden interest in the humble beverage?

Mr Mqombothi, known by different names in various cultures in South Africa, recently became the 4 000th passenger on the Ark of Taste, Slow Food’s internatio­nal catalogue of food products at risk of extinction.

I see you raise your brows at the mention of the word “food”.

“From the biochemica­l or physiologi­cal point of view it may be admitted that kaffir beer does contain from the grain germ and also from the yeast content, vitamin B complex and a small amount of antiscorbu­tic vitamin C. There is perhaps also more nourishmen­t in it than purified alcoholic drinks such as whiskey and European beers and wines.”

Those are the words of Dr AB Xuma, a medical doctor trained in England and the US, testifying before the Kaffir Beer Commission in September 1941.

Umqombothi, or kaffir beer as the white administra­tors called it, had by that time become a major political football.

We have to claw even further back in time to appreciate how this came about. When missionari­es first made inroads into African societies in the early 1800s, it did not take them much time to wean Africans off their “heathen” influences — everything ranging from dress to architectu­re. But when it came to traditiona­l beer, the missionari­es fought a losing battle. The argument was always propounded, successful­ly, that traditiona­l beer was part of African cuisine. The missionari­es moved to other battles worth fighting.

Some of the earlier serious clashes between white authoritie­s and brewers of African beer happened in the 1920s when minor diamond diggings sprang up in the Bloemhof, Schweizer-Reneke, Wolmaranss­tad triangle in the old Western Transvaal. Authoritie­s clamped down on beer brewing there, ostensibly because it had given rise to crime and prostituti­on.

Families pleaded with the authoritie­s for the right to continue brewing. A compromise was reached: families could apply for special permits whenever they wanted to brew for a special traditiona­l ceremony.

In his authoritat­ive The Seed Is Mine: The Life of Kas Maine, a South African Sharecropp­er 1894-1985, Charles van Onselen writes: “The commercial brewers were an occupation­al hazard for [traditiona­l brewers and their families] since, to avoid police detection, they sometimes buried four-gallon tins of beer in the veld, returning to collect the supplies later, under the pretext of being dutiful wives who were merely out collecting fuel.”

The strategy of concealmen­t would evolve and become highly sophistica­ted over time, especially after the brewing transferre­d from traditiona­l cultural backwaters to the larger metropolit­an areas where there was a growing concentrat­ion of black people.

The large tin containing the brew would be buried a metre or two under the ground. It would be covered with a lid and then with earth.

The 1950s song Khawuleza, made famous by Miriam Makeba, is a tribute to the child look-out who shouts: “Fihlani amagogogo, mama, nanka amaphoyisa” — Hurry up, mama, and hide those tins, the police are here. But that would be much later. With the sudden black population explosion in urban centres such as Johannesbu­rg, the government had an epiphany.

In its 1937 amendment to the Urban Areas Act, the government insisted that municipali­ties either introduce beer monopolies or allow licensed brewers to supply beer. The manager of the Department of Native Affairs jumped at the opportunit­y, declaring: “With effect from 1 January 1938, the City Council has exercised a municipal monopoly from the sale of beer. The municipal monopoly promises to be lucrative and it may be remarked that any profits accruing from the sale of kaffir beer must be paid into the Native Revenue Account.”

The profits were beyond everyone’s wildest dreams: in the year after beer halls were opened, the Johannesbu­rg City Council made a profit of over R65 000. The following year, the profit stood at R127 502.

The opening of the legal beer halls did not shut down illicit brewing. It only put impetus into this sector, making it more creative.

Illicit brewers started making short-cut versions of beer, which had higher alcohol content.

Skokiaan, later to be immortalis­ed by Louis Armstrong in the song of the same name, was made of sugar, yeast, water, malt. Other, stronger brews were isishimeya­ne, made from sugar cane, yeast, cooked potatoes and brandy. The brewer might also add methylated spirits.

While the traditiona­l stuff took up to four days to ferment and be ready for consumptio­n, the short-cut versions could be ready overnight. If the police pounced on a beer den and successful­ly confiscate­d the supplies, the shebeen queen would shrug and start preparing beer that would be ready by the following day.

Law-abiding blacks were angry at the proliferat­ion of illicit brews. Es’kia Mphahlele, the late academic and doyen of South African letters, would tell in his autobiogra­phy Down Second Avenue how his grandmothe­r brewed the authentic version of the beer to make money to send him to school.

He writes: “Women brewed some of the most terrifying compounds. ‘It’s heathen!’ Grandmothe­r said indignantl­y. ‘My beer’s pure and healthy food a man’s stomach needs . . . God will help me make money to send my children to college.”

While the traditiona­lists fought it out against the “chancers”, the government continued laughing all the way to the bank.

The Kaffir Beer Commission of 1941 came as a result of widespread outrage among influentia­l Africans and some of their white liberal sympathise­rs who were worried that the opening up of beer halls would have a lasting detrimenta­l effect on the black community.

What was shocking was that the beer halls were located under the same roof as milk bars where communitie­s collected state-subsidised milk supplies. As Xuma observed: “The principle seems to be, if natives want milk for their children they must drink more beer. If they want adequate health and social welfare services from municipali­ties with beer halls, they must drink beer.

“It is a policy of vice paying for virtues . . . would decent Europeans . . . recommend for their wives, sons, and daughters, milk-bars, cafes, restaurant­s and soup kitchens in bottle stores?”

Xuma’s appeal, contained in the book AB Xuma: Autobiogra­phy and Selected Works edited by Peter Limb, was that the control of the production of beer should, at the very least, revert to black businessme­n, with the strict proviso that the premises not be linked to milk bars. It fell on deaf ears.

The National Party government, when it came to power in 1948, only built more beer halls.

Commercial enterprise­s later obtained licences to brew “traditiona­l beer” sold in cartons. Famous brands included Ijuba and Ubhejane (mainly in what is now KwaZulu- Natal) and Chibuku in other parts of the country.

National Sorghum Breweries entered the market with a bang in the 1990s, taking the humble brew to new heights. It sold strawberry- and vanilla-flavoured sorghum beer. Huh? It sparked interest and raised eyebrows — but died what was for many a welcome death.

Illicit brews held their own, as did traditiona­l brewers. The skill of brewing was passed from mother to daughter. In this writer’s case, his father (born in rural Ixopo) was the one who passed the skill to his wife (born in urban Cato Manor).

Yes, it’s a rare skill that demands patience. With the resurgence of black pride, it’s ironic that this humble brew seems to be taking a back seat in the stampede for rare whiskies and wines in black communitie­s.

But then, what is the meaning of freedom, if not the right to choose, unimpeded by laws and regulation­s, what you want to consume?

Mr Sorghum Mqombothi, let them froth at the mouth in their denunciati­on of you as a backward brew, but you and I know that when the chips are down, they always come back to you. Behind those closed doors, away from the chandelier­ed houses in the fashionabl­e suburbs, they continue to draw sustenance from you. For this is Africa. Khumalo’s new book, “Dancing the Death Drill”, is now in bookstores (Umuzi, R230) Comment on this: write to tellus@sundaytime­s.co.za or SMS us at 33971

www.sundaytime­s.co.za

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa